2015
DOI: 10.1177/0884533615603966
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Resting Metabolic Rate in Overweight and Obese Adolescents With a Portable Indirect Calorimeter

Abstract: This pilot study found portable indirect calorimetry to be reliable and valid for assessing RMR in an overweight and obese adolescent population. In addition, this study indicates that portable indirect calorimetry may be an acceptable option for assessing RMR in this population compared with the traditional indirect calorimeter or predictive equations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such equipment can reduce accuracy because the respiratory quotient may vary from 0.7 to 1.0. Yet validation tests demonstrate that it is possible to accurately assess the REE only by oxygen consumption (VO 2 ) (12,41) . Another limitation of the present study may be related to the patient's position during indirect calorimetry (sitting and holding the mouthpiece).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such equipment can reduce accuracy because the respiratory quotient may vary from 0.7 to 1.0. Yet validation tests demonstrate that it is possible to accurately assess the REE only by oxygen consumption (VO 2 ) (12,41) . Another limitation of the present study may be related to the patient's position during indirect calorimetry (sitting and holding the mouthpiece).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RQ was used to test the metabolic cart validity, and the RQ from the metabolic cart for each patient was recorded and compared with the physiological range that exists in humans: 0.67–1.3 . Values measured outside this range were presumed to be an error in calibration, a leak in the system, or artifactual influence . These values were removed or “blocked out” of the final calculations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32,33,41 Values measured outside this range were presumed to be an error in calibration, a leak in the system, or artifactual influence. 32,40,41 These values were removed or "blocked out" of the final calculations.…”
Section: Indirect Calorimetermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations