2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10763-020-10143-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Epistemic Analysis Competence of Prospective Primary School Teachers on Proportionality Tasks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
10

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
9
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…In the epistemic facet, we could note the PPTs' limitations in identifying the mathematical objects involved in the problems they themselves created (Burgos et al, 2018;Burgos & Godino, 2022) and distinguishing proportional from non-proportional situations by creating problems that do not respond to a situation of proportionality but that they consider to be typical of that environment . The limitations in identifying mathematical objects could be a consequence of the lack of experience with this activity (Rivas et al, 2012), since their previous training in the degree and the workshop taught seem not to have been sufficient for them to understand the nature and functionality of the mathematical objects (Burgos & Godino, 2020b, 2021a.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the epistemic facet, we could note the PPTs' limitations in identifying the mathematical objects involved in the problems they themselves created (Burgos et al, 2018;Burgos & Godino, 2022) and distinguishing proportional from non-proportional situations by creating problems that do not respond to a situation of proportionality but that they consider to be typical of that environment . The limitations in identifying mathematical objects could be a consequence of the lack of experience with this activity (Rivas et al, 2012), since their previous training in the degree and the workshop taught seem not to have been sufficient for them to understand the nature and functionality of the mathematical objects (Burgos & Godino, 2020b, 2021a.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interventions developed with pre-service teachers (Burgos et al, 2018;Burgos & Godino, 2020b, 2021a, 2021b, 2022Malaspina et al, 2015;Malaspina et al, 2019;Mallart et al, 2018), using the constructs of the ontosemiotic approach (OSA) to mathematical knowledge and instruction (Godino & Batanero, 1994;Godino et al, 2007), show the close link between the ability to create problems that facilitate students' learning and their competence in didactic analysis. The latter involves, in particular, "analysing the mathematical activity when solving problems, identifying the practices, objects and processes put into play, and the variables that intervene in the statements, in order to formulate new problems and adapt them to each educational circumstance" (Godino et al, 2017, p. 92).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…La primera de ellas es la faceta epistémica, donde se considera la representatividad de los significados que se desarrollan en el aula en contraste con el significado de referencia que existe de cada objeto matemático (Burgos y Godino, 2021). La faceta cognitiva aborda la proximidad de los significados y su relación con el desarrollo cognitivo de quien aprende; la faceta afectiva, la implicación de los y las estudiantes en la trayectoria determinada por el profesor (Beltrán-Pellicer y Godino, 2020; Hummes et al, 2019).…”
Section: El Modelo Del Conocimiento Didáctico-matemático (Cdm)unclassified
“…La primera de ellas es la faceta epistémica, donde se considera la representatividad de los significados que se desarrollan en el aula en contraste con el significado de referencia que existe de cada objeto matemático (Burgos y Godino, 2021). La faceta cognitiva aborda la proximidad de los significados y su relación con el desarrollo cognitivo de quien aprende; la faceta afectiva, la implicación de los y las estudiantes en la trayectoria determinada por el profesor (Beltrán-Pellicer y Hummes et al, 2019).…”
Section: El Modelo Del Conocimiento Didáctico-matemático (Cdm)unclassified