2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the restorative potential of contemporary urban environment(s): Beyond the nature versus urban dichotomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
115
0
21

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 217 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
10
115
0
21
Order By: Relevance
“…However, some experts have argued that these boards and panels should be retained, because the convenience and safety of an inclusive environment design should not depend upon abstract understanding of the environment. For the historical and cultural heritage (3.57) indicator, the experts believed that this indicator has potential indirect contributions to health; some studies have shown that elderly people are enthusiastic about historical and cultural elements, which can provide an opportunity for them to reminisce, enhancing perceived interest, attractiveness, and sense of local identity [49,51]. For the microclimate (3.46) indicator, experts stated the natural enjoyment dimension generally corresponded with the demand of viewing and relaxing, mostly focused on relaxing, and overlapped with the criterion of comfortable seating with suitable orientations on pathways.…”
Section: Pretest Of Indictorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some experts have argued that these boards and panels should be retained, because the convenience and safety of an inclusive environment design should not depend upon abstract understanding of the environment. For the historical and cultural heritage (3.57) indicator, the experts believed that this indicator has potential indirect contributions to health; some studies have shown that elderly people are enthusiastic about historical and cultural elements, which can provide an opportunity for them to reminisce, enhancing perceived interest, attractiveness, and sense of local identity [49,51]. For the microclimate (3.46) indicator, experts stated the natural enjoyment dimension generally corresponded with the demand of viewing and relaxing, mostly focused on relaxing, and overlapped with the criterion of comfortable seating with suitable orientations on pathways.…”
Section: Pretest Of Indictorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Purcell et al (2001) found nature scenes with water were rated higher in restorativeness than nature scenes without water. Karmanov and Hamel (2008) study added to this finding by showing urban environments with an outlook onto water could have the same stress-reducing and mood-enhancing power as a natural environment. This may suggest that water bodies can compensate for the lack of greenery in urban environments.…”
Section: The Benefits Of Preferred Windowscapesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Qiu and Nielsen (2015) explained that experts assessment approach hold a dubious source to involve users' expression, ideas and feelings. Studies have shown the different viewpoints of experts and laypersons in perceiving of the landscape characteristics (Hofmann et al, 2012;Karmanov and Hamel, 2008). According to Grahn and Stigsdotter (2010), in a real-world experience, when seeking information on positive outcomes of nature interaction, users' multisensory perception of green space related characteristics are of great importance.…”
Section: -Supportive Environment Theory (Set)mentioning
confidence: 99%