2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11199-020-01222-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Rising Emphasis on Muscularity for Women: Psychometric Properties of the Brazilian Version of the Female Muscularity Scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The results showed that the understandability of the MOET ranged from 4.03 to 4.77, the understandability of the MDDI ranged from 3.50 to 4.53, and the understandability of the DMS ranged from 4.20 to 4.67. Based on Campos et al [ 42 ], means of understandability ≥3 were considered adequate understandability, representing degrees of understanding of approximately 80%. As such, the preliminary Chinese translations (i.e., the C-MOET, C-DMS and C-MDDI) were used in the subsequent studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed that the understandability of the MOET ranged from 4.03 to 4.77, the understandability of the MDDI ranged from 3.50 to 4.53, and the understandability of the DMS ranged from 4.20 to 4.67. Based on Campos et al [ 42 ], means of understandability ≥3 were considered adequate understandability, representing degrees of understanding of approximately 80%. As such, the preliminary Chinese translations (i.e., the C-MOET, C-DMS and C-MDDI) were used in the subsequent studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Caliskan and Alim (2021) additionally replicated the one‐factor structure of the MOET among Turkish university students. While related measures have been validated for use among men and women, including the drive for muscularity (e.g., using the Drive for Muscularity Scale; Carvalho et al, 2019; McCreary & Sasse, 2000), the drive for toned muscularity (e.g., using the Female Muscularity Scale; Campos et al, 2021; Rodgers et al, 2018), and muscle‐building activities (e.g., using the Eating Pathology Symptoms Inventory; Forbush et al, 2013), these measures were not purposefully designed to exclusively assess muscularity‐oriented disordered eating.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is interesting to note that muscularity concerns have also been documented among women (Campos et al, 2021; Carvalho et al, 2019; Girard et al, 2018; Rodgers et al, 2018), highlighting the need to develop instruments capable of assessing these body image concerns and muscularity‐oriented disordered dietary practices in women. Cunningham et al (2021) recently evaluated the MOET among university women in Australia, finding support for a briefer (12‐item) one‐factor scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher levels of the drive for muscularity have been linked to detrimental effects on health and associated with negative outcomes [4,9,11,[17][18][19]. A systematic review [17] identi ed that high levels of drive for muscularity were associated with exercise dependence, drug abuse, depression, anxiety, body shame, muscle dysmorphia, dietary manipulation, and impaired social and occupational functioning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%