2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of an Old Steel Railway Bridge Using Dynamic Tests.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Focusing on historic metallic structures, inspections are mostly focused on the verification of the effects of corrosion including functionality of protective coatings, level of the corrosion (corrosion weakening and pits), fatigue (including the development of cracks, their depth, width, and length and stress concentration zones), occurrence of eccentricities in members and checks of system behaviour (functionality of joints and bearings, stress transfer). Regarding these goals, the following methods of surveys are considered [2][3][4][5] iii. Non-destructive (NDT) detection of cracking by time-of-flight diffraction, phased arrays, ultrasonic testing, magnetoscopic examination and eddy current testing iv.…”
Section: Invasiveness Of Structural Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focusing on historic metallic structures, inspections are mostly focused on the verification of the effects of corrosion including functionality of protective coatings, level of the corrosion (corrosion weakening and pits), fatigue (including the development of cracks, their depth, width, and length and stress concentration zones), occurrence of eccentricities in members and checks of system behaviour (functionality of joints and bearings, stress transfer). Regarding these goals, the following methods of surveys are considered [2][3][4][5] iii. Non-destructive (NDT) detection of cracking by time-of-flight diffraction, phased arrays, ultrasonic testing, magnetoscopic examination and eddy current testing iv.…”
Section: Invasiveness Of Structural Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A random function compiled on the basis of arrays of measurement data of vibration parameters ϕ is considered stationary (in the broad sense), i.e., with the average of M ϕ(t) → const, while the covariance function depends solely on the difference between arguments τ − K ϕ (τ) Discrete Fourier transformation [16][17][18][19][28][29][30][31][32] may be used to process digital signals. Auto-covariance function of one data array or inter-covariance function of two arrays K ϕ (τ) is expressed as follows [78]:…”
Section: Covariance Model Of Vibration Signal Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accurate assessment of DAF ensures sustainable management of existing bridges [1]. Assessing the main natural frequencies and mode forms of the bridge is of particular importance [19]. They can also be monitored using GAMMA Portable Radar Interferometer (GPRI) [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vibration of the bridge structure was induced by an excitation strategy. Then, the natural frequency, damping ratio, vibration mode and other structural parameters were measured, and used to evaluate the technical condition and overall stiffness of the bridge structure [21][22][23].…”
Section: Test Principlementioning
confidence: 99%