Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of Information on Nutrition After Bariatric Surgery on YouTube

Batar, Nazlı; Kermen, Seda; Sevdin, Sezen; Yıldız, Nida; Güçlü, Duygu

doi:10.1007/s11695-020-05015-z

Cited by 18 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Videos that convey personal experiences in the form of a story seem to attract the attention of viewers, albeit long. It has been reported that the higher the video quality, the longer the video duration (19,20). In our study, a positive correlation was found between GQS, DISCERN and Y-SSS scores and video duration.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 74%

“…Each question was given 0 points if the relevant information was not included in the video, 1 point if there was missing information, and 2 points if full information was given. Video quality is grouped according to the total score as very poor (0-5), Poor (6-10), Fair (11)(12)(13)(14)(15), Good (16)(17)(18)(19)(20), Excellent (21-26). The questions used in the scoring system are in Table 1.…”

Section: Youtube Schizophrenia-specific Score (Y-sss)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

What does YouTube® say about schizophrenia: Is it a reliable source of information?

Kahve¹,

Asut²,

Kaya³

et al. 2022

Acibadem Universitesi Saglik Bilimleri Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose:The quantitative and qualitative characteristics of YouTube® videos on schizophrenia were examined. The quality of the information provided by the videos, which videos are watched the most, whether there is a relationship between the popularity and quality of the videos was evaluated. Methods and Materials:A search was performed on YouTube® on using the keyword "schizophrenia". The duration of the videos, the number of views,the number of like-dislike, the contents of the videos were recorded. To assess the popularity of the videos, view ratio, like ratio and the video power index (VPI) were used. The quality of information was assessed with DISCERN, Global Quality Scale (GQS) and YouTube Schizophrenia-Specific Score (Y-SSS).Results: Most of the videos were of low quality. 20% of the videos were fair and above according to DISCERN, 12.9% of the videos were fair and above according to Y-SSS. View ratio, like ratio and VPI of the videos categorized in patient/their relatives were the higher than the other categories. Although, the GQS, DISCERN and Y-SSS scores were lower than the others.The only predictive for like ratio was view ratio. Conclusion:Most of the videos about schizophrenia were personal experiences videos, and these were the most watched ones. Unfortunately, the quality of these videos was low. This may cause the development of wrong attitudes about the disease and its treatment. Also, incorrect information may contribute to the stigma surrounding the disorder. There is a need for mental health professionals to be more visible and to present qualified information in videos.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 74%

Section: Youtube Schizophrenia-specific Score (Y-sss)mentioning

confidence: 99%

What does YouTube® say about schizophrenia: Is it a reliable source of information?

Kahve¹,

Asut²,

Kaya³

et al. 2022

Acibadem Universitesi Saglik Bilimleri Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Detailed information about JAMA criteria is presented in Table S2 . In the JAMA evaluation, 0–1 point represents insufficient information, 2–3 points represents partially sufficient information, and 4 points represents completely sufficient information [ 35 , 36 ].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This strategy is also used to determine the contents of the videos shared on the YouTube ™ platform, the world’s largest and most well-known video-sharing platform, to inform various patient groups in terms of quality, usefulness, and reliability [ 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ]. Although, until today, billions of videos regarding sports nutrition and the use of sports supplements have been shared on YouTube ™ , there has been no study to determine the content analysis of these videos.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Evaluation of Videos about Branched-Chain Amino Acids Supplements on YouTube™: A Multi-Approach Study

Günalan

Turhan

Çavak

et al. 2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) are one of the most controversial ergogenic aids in terms of effectiveness and safety. This study aimed to evaluate the quality and reliability of BCAA supplements related to English videos on YouTubeä and to synthesize with the sentiment–emotion analysis of comments on videos. The content analysis of the information on videos was evaluated with the use of DISCERN, Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, and Global Quality Score (GQS). In addition, word cloud and sentiment and emotional analysis of comments in videos were performed with the R package. As a result, the mean ± standard error values of DISCERN, JAMA, and GQS scores of all videos were 29.27 ± 1.97, 1.95 ± 0.12, and 2.13 ± 0.17, respectively. It was found that advertisement-free videos have a significantly higher DISCERN and GQS score than advertisement-included videos (p < 0.05). A moderately significant positive correlation was determined between DISCERN score of video content and the positive sentiment of video comments (rs: 0.400, p = 0.002). In conclusion, it was determined that BCAA-related YouTubeä videos have mostly very poor quality in terms of content and that videos with higher quality may receive positive comments from viewers according to the DISCERN instrument.

show abstract

“…In the JAMA evaluation, 1 point represents insufficient knowledge, 2-3 points partially sufficient information, and 4 points quality information (Table 3). [15] Table 3 The popularity of the videos was evaluated by the video power index (VPI: like×100/[like + dislike]). In addition, view rate (total view/time since upload) was used to avoid the bias that a video on YouTube would get more views because it was uploaded earlier.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of YouTube videos as a patient education source for inguinal hernias

CİHAN¹,

Kartal

2023

Journal of Contemporary Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract Introduction: Patients frequently use YouTube to obtain information about their conditions and possible treatment options. Inguinal hernia is one of the most common surgical diseases among the general population. This study aims to evaluate the quality of videos about groin hernia on Youtube. Materials and Methods: The videos are sorted according to the number of views after searching for "groin hernia" on YouTube on 8.12.2021. The study was performed on the videos selected from the top 50 most-watched videos. Two independent reviewers reviewed all videos for relevance and content. In addition, the descriptive characteristics of each video (upload date, number of views, likes and dislikes, and comments below the video) were recorded in the dataset. DISCERN, GQS, and JAMA rating scales were used to evaluate the quality of the videos. Results: A statistically significant difference was found in DISCERN scores in the videos uploaded by doctors and non-physicians (p

show abstract

Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of Information on Nutrition After Bariatric Surgery on YouTube

Cited by 18 publications

References 27 publications

What does YouTube® say about schizophrenia: Is it a reliable source of information?

What does YouTube® say about schizophrenia: Is it a reliable source of information?

The Evaluation of Videos about Branched-Chain Amino Acids Supplements on YouTube™: A Multi-Approach Study

Evaluation of YouTube videos as a patient education source for inguinal hernias

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About