“…This disagreement between studies may be due to testing different age groups, and points to the need to test at multiple ages with a comprehensive battery of both rhythm (beatbased and nonbeat-based) and reading-related measures. In order to systematically partial out variance associated with different factors and identify specific links between beat-based processing and reading development, measures should address the cognitive, perceptual, and linguistic mechanisms hypothesized to underlie a reading-rhythm relationship, namely: auditory working memory, [51][52][53] attention, 54 sensorimotor integration, 30 processing of precise temporal mechanisms, 1,2,31,55 and generation of predictions based on perceptual regularity. 56 As evident from Table 1, while multiple studies have shown links between rhythm and readingrelated skills, these studies predominantly included rhythm patterns with beat-based structure, thereby excluding the examination of the distinct role of beat-based (versus nonbeat-based) processing in these relations.…”