2006
DOI: 10.1080/09515080600690557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attacking the Bounds of Cognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
89
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
89
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent analyses have brought to the fore that such devices should not be understood, as used to be the case, as merely external stand-ins for already existing purely internal processes (Clark, 2003;Menary, 2006Menary, , 2007. Rather, METs provide means of expanding cognition in ways that would have been impossible without them.…”
Section: Beyond Dominance and Deference: Sensory Substitution As Percmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recent analyses have brought to the fore that such devices should not be understood, as used to be the case, as merely external stand-ins for already existing purely internal processes (Clark, 2003;Menary, 2006Menary, , 2007. Rather, METs provide means of expanding cognition in ways that would have been impossible without them.…”
Section: Beyond Dominance and Deference: Sensory Substitution As Percmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second interpretation of METs has been proposed according to which METs do transform cognition in a qualitative way (Clark, 2003;Menary, 2006Menary, , 2007. Novel tools not only facilitate established cognitive processes; they can also allow for the appearance of novel cognitive operations, which simply would have been impossible without them.…”
Section: Beyond Dominance and Deference: Sensory Substitution As Percmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Developing research programmes in distributed cognition and the extended mind are being tested and applied in disciplines ranging from science studies (Giere, 2002) to cognitive archaeology (Knappett, 2005), computer-supported cooperative work (Halverson, 2002), and Shakespeare studies (Tribble, 2005). Philosophical defenses of the extended mind (Clark & Chalmers, 1998;Rowlands, 1999;Wilson, 2004) have generated a robust, critical, ongoing debate about the conceptual foundations of the approach (Adams & Aizawa, 2001Clark, in press;Menary, 2006;Rupert, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the initial feelers tentatively extended within externalist philosophy in the nineteen-eighties, a number of new theoretical frameworks have arisen such as, extended cognition (Clark, 1997(Clark, , 2001(Clark, , 2008Wheeler, 2005;Rowlands, 2009Rowlands, , 2010Menary, 2006Menary, , 2010and Manzotti, 2006), embodied cognition (Shapiro, 2010;Chemero, 2009;Rowlands, 1999;Anderson, 2003;Chiel & Beer, 1997;Lakoff & Johnson, 1980;Johnson, 1987) and enactive cognition (Varela, Thompson & Rosch, 1991;Maturana & Varela, 1980;Thompson & Stapelton, 2009;Thompson, 2007;Stewart, Gappene & di Paolo (eds. ), 2010;Noë, 2009;& di Paolo, 2009) (list taken from Malafouris, 2013, pp.…”
Section: -43)mentioning
confidence: 99%