2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attenuation of the evoked responses with repeated exposure to proprioceptive disturbances is muscle specific

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could lead to a bias in outcome due to adaptation of muscles to vibration (Caudron et al 2010). However, where this effect was found over a time interval of 10-20 s, we took at least 5 min between two trials on the same muscle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could lead to a bias in outcome due to adaptation of muscles to vibration (Caudron et al 2010). However, where this effect was found over a time interval of 10-20 s, we took at least 5 min between two trials on the same muscle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any changes in muscle length, more so when rapid, activate, in fact, the large spindle afferent fibres, highly sensitive to the velocity of muscle stretch rather than the slow muscle changes in length as when standing on a Solid support (118,119). And the spindle input is certainly funnelled to the appropriate motor pools (120)(121)(122)(123) and supra spinal centres (124,125). In this light, a larger RQ on Foam compared to Solid support would be expression of the role played by vision in modulating the central integration of vestibular and somatosensory information (126,127) rather than of the mere advantage connected with the presence of an external (visual) reference (128) 54) also showed that the oscillation frequency increases with EC compared to EO when subjects stand on Foam.…”
Section: Proprioception and Vision On Firm And Compliant Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of specific interest has been the potential sensory contribution of the primary dorsiflexor, the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle. This muscle is known to play a role in maintaining upright stance, highlighted by detrimental localized effects of vibration (3,28,34,35) and fatigue (1, 10) on balance control. Despite providing some degree of ankle torque when balance is challenged (17,35), during normal quiet standing the TA remains relatively quiet and unmodulated in activity throughout the sway cycle (6,31).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%