2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attitudes towards individuals with disabilities as measured by the Implicit Association Test: A literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

11
96
2
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
11
96
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Wilson and Scior, 2014), the IAT scores from individuals with xenomelia differed strongly. The latter group showed a strong explicit and a weak implicit preference for amputated bodies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wilson and Scior, 2014), the IAT scores from individuals with xenomelia differed strongly. The latter group showed a strong explicit and a weak implicit preference for amputated bodies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Similarly, a literature review on attitudes towards individuals with disabilities concluded that there is weak to no association between explicit and implicit measures (Wilson and Scior, 2014). A low correspondence between explicit and implicit measures has been shown to be associated with four factors (Nosek, 2005): a) self-representation, which describes the modification of an explicit preference for personal or social reasons, b) evaluative strength, which predicts higher associations for personally important and frequently emerging contexts, c) dimensionality, with unipolar categories causing lower associations compared to bipolar ones, and d) distinctiveness, which characterizes the perceived incongruence between one's own and societal norms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recently published World Report on Disability suggests there are approximately one billion people across the globe with some form of disability, representing around 15% of the world's population. The trend was a sizeable increase from the last World Health Organisation estimate of around 10% in the 1970s [13]. Besides, the United Nations estimates that the number of persons with disabilities in Malaysia is about 2.8 million, or 10 percent of its population of 28 million [4].…”
Section: Disable Facilities In Public Hospitalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stigma implisit dipengaruhi oleh banyak faktor seperti keyakinan subjek tentang masa depan, sensitivitas subjek terhadap konsep disabilitas, serta kontak yang dimiliki subjek dengan penyandang disabilitas (Wilson & Scior, 2014). Analisis lanjutan terhadap elemen stigma implisit mengungkap bahwa asosiasi ini konsisten pada elemen kognitif (stereotipe), namun tidak pada elemen afektif (prasangka) dan perilaku (diskriminasi).…”
Section: Diskusiunclassified
“…Penelitian dengan SC-IAT oleh Wang, Huang, Jackson, dan Chen (2012) mengindikasikan bahwa walaupun mahasiswa di Cina tidak melaporkan stigma pada level eksplisit, lebih dari 60% mahasiswa ternyata memiliki bias implisit negatif kepada penyandang gangguan mental. Meskipun demikian, belum ditemukan korelasi yang konsisten antara stigma implisit dan stigma eksplisit (Wilson & Scior, 2014). Pemetaan pola korelasi antara kedua level stigma tersebut adalah tujuan pertama dari penelitian ini.…”
unclassified