2021
DOI: 10.3390/app11167218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Fault Detection and Extraction under Gas Chimneys Using Hybrid Discontinuity Attributes

Abstract: 3D-seismic data have increasingly shifted seismic interpretation work from a horizons-based to a volume-based focus over the past decade. The size of the identification and mapping work has therefore become difficult and requires faster and better tools. Faults, for instance, are one of the most significant features of subsurface geology interpreted from seismic data. Detailed fault interpretation is very important in reservoir characterization and modeling. The conventional manual fault picking is a time-cons… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Seismic attributes are characterized as the most informative tools to characterize seismic features, such as layer velocity, acoustic impedance inversion [4,24,41], and pore pressure prediction [37], after the emergence of intricate trace theory during the earlier phases of the 1970s, the initial application of seismic attribute analysis was directed towards the realm of oil exploration in the decades between the 1970s and 1980s [42], the term "attributes" pertains to measurements that are generated from seismic data, for instance, envelope amplitude (commonly referred to as "re ection strength"), velocity, instantaneous frequency, polarity, instantaneous phase, slope, slope azimuth, seismic interpretation methods have made it conceivable to calculate volumes of structural attributes and augment faults in seismic data due to automated fault extraction using a variety of seismic features [25].…”
Section: Seismic Attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seismic attributes are characterized as the most informative tools to characterize seismic features, such as layer velocity, acoustic impedance inversion [4,24,41], and pore pressure prediction [37], after the emergence of intricate trace theory during the earlier phases of the 1970s, the initial application of seismic attribute analysis was directed towards the realm of oil exploration in the decades between the 1970s and 1980s [42], the term "attributes" pertains to measurements that are generated from seismic data, for instance, envelope amplitude (commonly referred to as "re ection strength"), velocity, instantaneous frequency, polarity, instantaneous phase, slope, slope azimuth, seismic interpretation methods have made it conceivable to calculate volumes of structural attributes and augment faults in seismic data due to automated fault extraction using a variety of seismic features [25].…”
Section: Seismic Attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geology of South‐East Asia is considered a vital avenue for hydrocarbon generation and petroleum production in the Tertiary sedimentary successions (Al‐Masgari et al, 2021; Imran et al, 2020, 2021; Usman, Siddiqui, Zhang, et al, 2020). The generation of large amounts of sediments from various local sources and their deposition in the deep‐marine environments is believed to be associated with the complex geology of Borneo in the Tertiary period (Ahmed, Siddiqui, Rahman, et al, 2021; Ahmed, Siddiqui, Ramasamy, et al, 2021; Hall et al, 2008; Ogawa & Back, 2022; Siddiqui et al, 2017; Usman, Zhang, Siddiqui, & Jamaluddin., 2020).…”
Section: Geological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some traditional methods have been able to find faults by analyzing and calculating some attributes dependent on lateral discontinuities in 2D and 3D seismic images [10,11]. Many researchers have utilized different attributes for detecting faults such as the curvature [2,12], variance [13,14], semblance [4,15], coherency [10,[16][17][18], eigenstructure [17,19], fault likelihood [20], similarity [8,21,22], entropy [23], flexure [3,24,25], gradient magnitude [26], chaos [26,27] and derivatives [3,18,28,29]. In earlier research, Rijks et al presented how the azimuth and dip magnitude may reveal very tiny faults with movement substantially lower than that of a seismic wavelet [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%