2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-31753-3_44
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Setting of Bus Schedule Coverage Using Unsupervised Machine Learning

Abstract: Abstract. The efficiency of Public Transportation (PT) Networks is a major goal of any urban area authority. Advances on both location and communication devices drastically increased the availability of the data generated by their operations. Adequate Machine Learning methods can thus be applied to identify patterns useful to improve the Schedule Plan. In this paper, the authors propose a fully automated learning framework to determine the best Schedule Coverage to be assigned to a given PT network based on Au… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traffic and commuter demand has also been considered in the work by Wang et al [27]. Other than employing optimization algorithms several deep learning techniques [22] have been applied in bus scheduling problems [15].…”
Section: Related Work and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traffic and commuter demand has also been considered in the work by Wang et al [27]. Other than employing optimization algorithms several deep learning techniques [22] have been applied in bus scheduling problems [15].…”
Section: Related Work and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreira-Matias et al [23] introduced a generic and simple framework to empower the resistance of most induction learning algorithms and solve transportation problems. Khiari et al [24] proposed an unsupervised learning framework to determine the best schedule coverage to be assigned to a given PT network, and improve schedule reliability on a large scale.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This shortcoming is found in the reliability performance measurements, and in the analysis of possible unreliability causes and sources, as well as in the headway analysis reported in inferential statistics models. More precisely, first, in the extensive literature on the use of off-line AVL data, there are several studies in which anomalies are ignored, [26][27][28][29][30][31] even if there are exceptions in which data pruning, 32 days pruning 33 and data imputation methods 34 were performed. Second, Hammerle et al 35 mentioned AVL data anomalies in the calculation of headways, but they were not carefully analyzed and accurately measured, that is, the anomalies were intentionally neglected.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TF and IOS were ignored in Feng and Figliozzi 37 in the calculation of the headway delay. Fourth, no previous studies [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] (i) distinguished between a TF and an IOS, which differently affect the passenger's viewpoint and (ii) rebuilt the original schedule at a stop to reflect the published time at the stop. Therefore, to the best of our knowledge, a gap exists in the literature on the accurate use of AVL raw data, both in the calculation of headway and of schedule deviation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%