2010
DOI: 10.1201/b10384-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Balanced Realizations, Model Order Reduction, and the Hankel Operator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These parameters and the noise variances were chosen so that the system could not be well approximated by a lower-order one—i.e., so that the uncontrolled and controlled systems were “truly” second- and third-order (respectively). This was accomplished by ensuring that the Hankel singular values [ 14 ] for the system, with output matrix C = [1 0] and input matrix set by the noise variances, were within one order of magnitude of each other; that is, ensuring that the transfer function from noise to joint angle had roughly equal power in all modes. For the uncontrolled system, this was achieved with Σ θ = diag([5 e -7, 5 e -5]); for the controlled system, Σ θ = diag([5 e -5, 1 e -6]) and .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These parameters and the noise variances were chosen so that the system could not be well approximated by a lower-order one—i.e., so that the uncontrolled and controlled systems were “truly” second- and third-order (respectively). This was accomplished by ensuring that the Hankel singular values [ 14 ] for the system, with output matrix C = [1 0] and input matrix set by the noise variances, were within one order of magnitude of each other; that is, ensuring that the transfer function from noise to joint angle had roughly equal power in all modes. For the uncontrolled system, this was achieved with Σ θ = diag([5 e -7, 5 e -5]); for the controlled system, Σ θ = diag([5 e -5, 1 e -6]) and .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes the system stable and oscillatory (which first-order models cannot be). (2) Σ x was chosen so that the Hankel singular values (see Scherpen, 2015) for the system, with output matrix C = 1 0 and input matrix set by Σ x , were within one order of magnitude of each other; that is, ensuring that the transfer function from noise to position had roughly equal power in all modes. This was achieved with Σ x = diag( 5e-7, 5e-5 ).…”
Section: Appendix a Information Retention And Identifiabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the following sections we review balancing of linear and nonlinear systems as introduced in [29] and [36]. See also [37] for a good survey on balancing for linear and nonlinear systems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where σ 2 i is an eigenvalue of H * H with the corresponding eigenvector Ψ i , ordered as σ 1 ≥ • • • ≥ σ n > 0 and σ i≥n+1 = 0 are the Hankel singular values of the input-output system Σ. For square linear systems, the nonzero eigenvalues of the Hankel operator associated to the system are the nonzero eigenvalues of the cross Gramian defined as the solution, W x , of AW x + W x A + BC = 0 [37].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation