2007
DOI: 10.15554/pcij.03012007.32.44
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavior of Unbonded, Post- Tensioned, Precast Concrete Connections with Different Percentages of Mild Steel Reinforcement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A satisfactory seismic resistant precast joint must be able to fulfill the capacity of good energy dissipation, ductility, stiffness and ultimate strength. Among the discussed and presented types of joints for ductile precast concrete frame for earthquake resistant structure, the least recommended connection is through field welding as specified by Ozden and Ertas (2007) and Englekirk (1996). The main reason behind the unfavorable of welding is that field welding is often pricey and can create adverse results when the effects of welded regions are not thoroughly considered by the engineers, such as the additional forces caused by volume changes or eccentric temporary (or construction) loading (PCI Connection Details Committee, 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A satisfactory seismic resistant precast joint must be able to fulfill the capacity of good energy dissipation, ductility, stiffness and ultimate strength. Among the discussed and presented types of joints for ductile precast concrete frame for earthquake resistant structure, the least recommended connection is through field welding as specified by Ozden and Ertas (2007) and Englekirk (1996). The main reason behind the unfavorable of welding is that field welding is often pricey and can create adverse results when the effects of welded regions are not thoroughly considered by the engineers, such as the additional forces caused by volume changes or eccentric temporary (or construction) loading (PCI Connection Details Committee, 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This proved that the amount of shear reinforcement provided in the joint as specified in the codes could be reduced. In other related research by Ozden and Ertas (2007), it was found out that the optimum amount of mild steel reinforcement that would best satisfied the connection's flexural capacity would be 20-30%.…”
Section: Hybrid Post-tensioning Frame Connectionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Ozen, 2007 [14] five low cyclic reversed loading tests on connections with mixed connections were carried out in 2007. The prestressing tendon is located at half of the height of the beam, and the non prestressed steel bars are respectively arranged at the top of the beam and the bottom of the beam.…”
Section: Other Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive investigations have validated that PT RC beam-column joints [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] and column (pier)-foundation joints [11][12][13][14] have excellent self-centering ability with little residual deformation under quasistatic cyclic loading. Many ED devices have been developed, ranging from internal mild steel (MS) rebars [3][4][5]8] to external dampers mounted at joints, which are easy to replace after failure, such as MS dampers [7,9,12,13], friction dampers [6,10], and angle steels [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%