Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications 2014
DOI: 10.1145/2667317.2667332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Better Driving and Recall When In-car Information Presentation Uses Situationally-Aware Incremental Speech Output Generation

Abstract: It is established that driver distraction is the result of sharing cognitive resources between the primary task (driving) and any other secondary task. In the case of holding conversations, a human passenger who is aware of the driving conditions can choose to interrupt his speech in situations potentially requiring more attention from the driver, but in-car information systems typically do not exhibit such sensitivity. We have designed and tested such a system in a driving simulation environment. Unlike other… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Experiment 1 was performed in previous work presented in [14], but as the setup is a precursor, and the results are directly comparable to the work done Figure 4: Overview of our system: solid lines denote connections between hardware and software components, colours denote the workstations (in this case 4) that we used. Dashed lines denote network connections between components, arrows denote InstantIO connections, diamonds denote RSB connections.…”
Section: Softwaresupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Experiment 1 was performed in previous work presented in [14], but as the setup is a precursor, and the results are directly comparable to the work done Figure 4: Overview of our system: solid lines denote connections between hardware and software components, colours denote the workstations (in this case 4) that we used. Dashed lines denote network connections between components, arrows denote InstantIO connections, diamonds denote RSB connections.…”
Section: Softwaresupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Some stated that they would like to be able to control the system in some way (giving rise to Experiment 2). There were further results in Experiment 1 that are not of interest here and for which we refer the reader to [14].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A proposta de Kennington et al, (2014) comparou duas interfaces de saída de voz e como elas afetam o desempenho das tarefas principal e secundária. Os autores propuseram uma interface adaptativa capaz de reconhecer os momentos nos quais o motorista precisa de mais atenção na via e capaz de interromper a saída de voz durante tal momento, com o objetivo de não distrair o condutor naquele período.…”
Section: Saída De Voz Em Ivisunclassified
“…OpenDS has been commonly used to measure drivers' reaction-times and behaviour (e.g., attention, workload) [30,38,61]. It has been used as an effective tool to measure the usability of different multi-modal interfaces [37,47], and to evaluate collaborative driving [7,46].…”
Section: Overview Of Opendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kennington et al [36] developed a speech generation system which mimics human passenger conversations. The idea is for this system to recognize situations that require a driver's complete attention.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%