Bibliometrics and systematic reviews: A comparison between the Proknow-C and the Methodi Ordinatio

Carvalho, Gustavo Dambiski Gomes de; Sokulski, Carla Cristiane; Silva, Wesley Vieira da; Carvalho, Hélio Gomes de; Moura, Rafael Vignoli de; Francisco, Antônio Carlos de; Veiga, Claudimar Pereira da

doi:10.1016/j.joi.2020.101043

Cited by 61 publications

(51 citation statements)

References 63 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…To do this, it took different stages as: definitions of databases, definition of keywords, elimination of repeated articles and alignment by reading the title, abstract and main findings. As discussed by Carvalho et al (2020), these stages are present in different frameworks used as guidelines for systematic literature review.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Accounting services quality: a systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis

Azzari

Mainardes

Costa

2020

AJAR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to identify and analyze the literature related to accounting and auditing services quality.Design/methodology/approachThe authors performed a systematic literature review that considered 22 papers on the topic. The authors also applied a bibliometric analysis in order to identify the main characteristics of these studies to discuss and provide research opportunities in this field.FindingsThe bibliometric results indicate that most papers were published in services and marketing journals. The accounting service quality theme has been rarely researched in accounting field. In addition, based on our review, it was possible to identify that most papers use quantitative methods, such as surveys. The papers' conclusions diverge from each other, demonstrating a still fragmented literature.Research limitations/implicationsTaken together, the paper shows how accounting services quality is relevant and emerging topic that demands future research about accounting professionals' skills, their activities and how their customers perceive quality in an environment of constant change.Originality/valueThe analyses indicate that there are six broad areas for future research on this topic: successes and failures of accounting services providers; the role of “client centricity”; digital accounting services; services quality and accounting education; services quality when considering different types of accounting and auditing services and development of a measurement scale and a theoretical model for accounting services quality. This paper contributes for the ongoing debate about how competition, technology and innovation are changing the landscape for accounting and auditing services providers.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Accounting services quality: a systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis

Azzari

Mainardes

Costa

2020

AJAR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…From this, the InOrdinatio index is calculated, and the researcher obtains a bibliographic portfolio [23]. This methodology has been used by authors such as [24][25][26].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

E-Health Practices and Technologies: A Systematic Review from 2014 to 2019

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

E-health can be defined as a set of technologies applied with the help of the internet, in which healthcare services are provided to improve quality of life and facilitate healthcare delivery. As there is a lack of similar studies on the topic, this analysis uses a systematic literature review of articles published from 2014 to 2019 to identify the most common e-health practices used worldwide, as well as the main services provided, diseases treated, and the associated technologies that assist in e-health practices. Some of the key results were the identification of the four most common practices used (mhealth or mobile health; telehealth or telemedicine; technology; and others) and the most widely used technologies associated with e-health (IoT, cloud computing, Big Data, security, and systems).

show abstract

“…Since then, it has been continuously improved and has aggregated features that explore the several possibilities of identification and analysis of bibliographic portfolios (Ensslin, Dezem, Dutra, Ensslin & Somensi, 2018). Proknow-C was chosen due to its constructivist orientation and its detailing and methodological rigor, in addition to its increasing applications (Ensslin et al , 2018; Carvalho et al , 2020) since it was developed. Every data collection and data analysis process of this research was guided by this instrument.…”

Section: Methodological Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implementation of large-scale health information systems

Luz

Mussi

Dutra

et al. 2021

REGE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe study aims to analyze the previous literature on government initiatives to implement health information systems (HISs).Design/methodology/approachProknow-C (Knowledge Development Process-Constructivist) was used in the selection of the literature and in the bibliometric and systematic analysis.FindingsThe research identified a portfolio composed of 33 articles aligned with the research theme and with scientific recognition, as well as periodicals, authors, papers and keywords that stood out the most. Amongst the government initiatives in the 24 identified countries, England has been the most studied nation, and there is a certain prominence of research arising from developed countries. Electronic health records (EHRs) have been the most explored technology. Efficiency and safety of health care delivery, integration of information and among health organizations, cost reduction and economicity are the most expected benefits from government programs. The difficulties found are related to the broader context in which the system is inserted, to the management of the program, to technology itself and to individuals. The most emphasized difficulties identified in most countries were previous context marked by a lack of standardization/interoperability, acceptance of providers and users and project financing. The findings of the present article provide a theoretical framework for future studies, in addition to yielding a replicable process for future use.Originality/valueThis research may be considered original as it analyzes – through a constructivism-structured process (Proknow-C) – the phenomenon under investigation by gathering bibliometric and systematic review data concomitantly. The countries and technologies reported emerge from the process itself.

show abstract

Bibliometrics and systematic reviews: A comparison between the Proknow-C and the Methodi Ordinatio

Cited by 61 publications

References 63 publications

Accounting services quality: a systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis

Accounting services quality: a systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis

E-Health Practices and Technologies: A Systematic Review from 2014 to 2019

Implementation of large-scale health information systems

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About