2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c04522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological Metal–Organic Frameworks (Bio-MOFs) for CO2Capture

Abstract: Industrialization and economic development have accelerated energy consumption and the release of CO2 to the atmosphere. The continual increase in CO2 levels is contributing to climate change; therefore, mitigating CO2 emissions warrants intensive research. Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have demonstrated potential as adsorbents for CO2 capture, but their cost makes them impractical for industrial applications. Inexpensive biomolecules, including amino acids, proteins, peptides, and porphyrins, can be used as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To this end, different classes of sorbents including zeolites [29], activated carbons [30], metal organic frameworks (MOFs) [31,32], metal oxides materials [33], silica [34], lithium zirconate [35], etc. [36], have been proposed for carbon capture and sequestration by adsorption, being crucial for large scale applications, to consider sustainability, stability, loading capacity, regeneration condition, density and hydrophobic/hydrophilic character, simultaneously [17].…”
Section: Adsorption Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, different classes of sorbents including zeolites [29], activated carbons [30], metal organic frameworks (MOFs) [31,32], metal oxides materials [33], silica [34], lithium zirconate [35], etc. [36], have been proposed for carbon capture and sequestration by adsorption, being crucial for large scale applications, to consider sustainability, stability, loading capacity, regeneration condition, density and hydrophobic/hydrophilic character, simultaneously [17].…”
Section: Adsorption Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface area is not the only things that affects gas adsorption capacity. From the results of our previous study, the surface area of the Bio-MOF did not have a significant effect on the CO 2 adsorption capacity 8) . On the contradictory to the pore The XRD investigation was performed to obtain the phase identification of crystalline material and showed the information on unit cell dimensions 22) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…MOF was first popularized in the 1990s and it has attracted the attention of scientists in the last two decades 7) . Aside from common porous materials such as zeolites, silica, or activated carbon, MOF has special physical properties such as high thermal stability and porosity, easily controlled structure, and fast kinetic which make this type of adsorben to be the most promising material that has been developed in various engineering branch applications such as natural gas, syngas, biogas in CO2 removal [8][9][10] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adsorbents are the foundation for the adsorption process. In recent years, many porous solid adsorbents have been investigated in order to capture CO 2 from flue gas, including carbon materials [ 14 , 15 , 16 ], zeolites [ 17 ], mesoporous silicon [ 18 ], pillared lamellar clays [ 19 ], and the metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) [ 20 , 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%