1994
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.308.6924.298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blood pressure in prospective population based cohort of newborn and infant twins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As in our study, there was little difference between systolic and diastolic readings between 4 months and 12 months of age, and there was no gender difference. As with other studies using ultrasonic devices, the mean systolic and diastolic readings were lower than those found in our study [21,22].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…As in our study, there was little difference between systolic and diastolic readings between 4 months and 12 months of age, and there was no gender difference. As with other studies using ultrasonic devices, the mean systolic and diastolic readings were lower than those found in our study [21,22].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…Barker et al [11]and others [12, 13, 14, 15]have reported strong associations between fetal growth and hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and ischaemic heart disease in adult life. These potential long-term consequences of changes in intrauterine growth, and the fact that optimal fetal growth is a good predictor of infancy and childhood development, emphasise the importance of examining not only the teratogenic risk but also fetal growth abnormalities and perinatal effects associated with drug exposure during pregnancy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twins, therefore, would be expected to have a greater risk of diseases that are associated with lower birth weight, such as coronary heart disease, hypertension and diabetes. However, epidemiological studies in twins have produced conflicting results (8,30,31,39,40,53,60,63).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%