2014
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2013.2288786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Body Effects on Thin Single-Layer Slot, Self-Complementary, and Wire Antennas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reported read distances were in the range of 80-120 cm depending on the position of the tag over the body. The performance of several types of thin single-layer antennas (e.g slot, self-complementary and wire antenna) for plasterlike sensor application at 2.4 GHz study were extensively investigated in [17] to search for the antenna layout that is best suited to operate in the very close proximity of the human body. Very recently, we proposed [18] a preliminary idea for a passive RFID epidermal tag for the on-skin temperature measurement, with a specific focus to the use of a highly breathable membrane such as the the "-polycaprolacton.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported read distances were in the range of 80-120 cm depending on the position of the tag over the body. The performance of several types of thin single-layer antennas (e.g slot, self-complementary and wire antenna) for plasterlike sensor application at 2.4 GHz study were extensively investigated in [17] to search for the antenna layout that is best suited to operate in the very close proximity of the human body. Very recently, we proposed [18] a preliminary idea for a passive RFID epidermal tag for the on-skin temperature measurement, with a specific focus to the use of a highly breathable membrane such as the the "-polycaprolacton.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads to reduction in the antennas' radiation performance through the consumption of energy in the interaction between the antenna's electromagnetic (EM) fields and the body. This inherently limits the attainable radiation efficiency of especially single-layered antennas [18]. In comparison, multilayered structures, such as microstrip patch [19], (planar) inverted-F antennas [20][21][22], and antennas based on substrate-integrated waveguides and metamaterials [23][24][25], benefit from the built-in antennabody isolation provided by the ground plane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As largely discussed in the open literature, the human body proximity represents a critical issue for the wearable devices performance [1]- [21]. Since it is a non-homogeneous lossy material, it the human body affects the antenna input impedance and radiation efficiency, leading to a degradation of the overall system performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, it follows that low-frequency wearable antennas are electrically small, and only one of the two energy densities dominates in the antenna nearfield (NF) region. Since the human body is a non-magnetic material, electrically small magnetic antennas perform better than electrically small electric antennas, when they operate close to, or inside, the human body [20]- [21]. On the other hand, several body-centric wireless systems operate at relatively high frequency, such as those based on technologies like UHF RFID, Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) or Bluetooth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%