2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2014.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bonferroni, Holm, and Hochberg Corrections: Fun Names, Serious Changes to P Values

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
56
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We excluded variants of unknown significance and we did not count the index aberration in the total number. We found that a total of 105 of 271 (38.7%) are significant at P≤.05; using the Bonferroni correction 32 for multiple comparisons, a total of 31 of 271 (11.4%) are significant at P≤.00,018.…”
Section: Molecular Landscape Of Patients With Gna* Alterationsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…We excluded variants of unknown significance and we did not count the index aberration in the total number. We found that a total of 105 of 271 (38.7%) are significant at P≤.05; using the Bonferroni correction 32 for multiple comparisons, a total of 31 of 271 (11.4%) are significant at P≤.00,018.…”
Section: Molecular Landscape Of Patients With Gna* Alterationsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…This usually arises when the same statistical tests are repeatedly computed from the same set of observations in a hypothesis-driven research [33]. Fortunately, there are several ways of addressing this issue, many of which require researchers to set a more stringent significance threshold [34,35]. For example, while many of the transition correlations presented in the current study remained significant at P <.01, it is important to note that we did not have a priori hypotheses regarding what specific types of location pairs would be most relevant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other data are presented as mean ± SEM. Subsequently, we performed the Benjamini-Hochberg test to correct the p-value of every parameter for multiple hypothesis testing (Benjamini & Hochberg, 1995;McLaughlin & Sainani, 2014). These corrections are shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%