2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0920-5861(03)00247-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catalytic combustion of methane over bimetallic catalysts a comparison between a novel annular reactor and a high-pressure reactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For Pt mass fractions higher than 20% only one reduction step was observed at lower temperatures. This behavior was also reported by others [4] and can be attributed to the promotion of PdO reduction by platinum addition.…”
Section: Catalyst Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For Pt mass fractions higher than 20% only one reduction step was observed at lower temperatures. This behavior was also reported by others [4] and can be attributed to the promotion of PdO reduction by platinum addition.…”
Section: Catalyst Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…has been proposed by several authors. Ersson et al [4] studied the influence of Pt and Rh on the behavior of Pd/Al 2 O 3 catalysts and found an increased stability when Pt was used as a co-metal. Narui et al [5] observed decreased sintering of the metal particles when platinum was added to palladium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 Previous reports preferred ZrO2 support for Rh catalysts, in order to avoid detrimental interaction between Rh and alumina (Al2O3), that reduces the activity of the catalyst. 28 However, the disadvantage of ZrO2 is low surface area compared to other supports. 28 But TiO2 with its bare outer surface and with less number of free defective hydroxyl groups might be inadequate to adsorb sufficient amount of Pt and Rh precursors to form bimetal particles and hence conversion is not exceeding 50%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 However, the disadvantage of ZrO2 is low surface area compared to other supports. 28 But TiO2 with its bare outer surface and with less number of free defective hydroxyl groups might be inadequate to adsorb sufficient amount of Pt and Rh precursors to form bimetal particles and hence conversion is not exceeding 50%. Hence this study clearly demonstrates both Al2O3 and ZrO2 are better supports than TiO2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation