2010
DOI: 10.1109/surv.2010.020110.00047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Channel assignment schemes for infrastructure-based 802.11 WLANs: A survey

Abstract: In this paper, we propose an optimization model for solving the channel assignment problem in multi-cell WLANs which is based on maximizing the minimum distance between access points that operate on the same channel. The formulation of the proposed model is presented in the form of a mixed integer linear program (MILP). The main advantage of the proposed algorithm is that it guarantees non-overlapping channel assignment without measurement overhead. The proposed algorithm can be implemented in real time. Simul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
102
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
102
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…where β k is a Lagrangian multiplier chosen to saturate the power constraints (2). Note that this result shows the connections between the notion of NE and the well-known water-filling PA policy [13].…”
Section: Determination Of the Nementioning
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…where β k is a Lagrangian multiplier chosen to saturate the power constraints (2). Note that this result shows the connections between the notion of NE and the well-known water-filling PA policy [13].…”
Section: Determination Of the Nementioning
confidence: 64%
“…Assume also that ∀k ∈ K, p k,max = p max and ∀s ∈ S, σ 2 s = σ 2 and B s = . The number of players is K = 3 and the number of actions is S = 2, under the condition φ(p (2) ) > φ(p (6) ) > φ(p (1) ) > φ(p (5) ) > φ(p (4) ) > φ(p (7) ) > φ(p (8) ) > φ(p (3) ). Total number of vertices: …”
Section: The 2-transmitter 2-channel Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the comparison of channel allocation algorithms is based on traffic distribution, implementation cost, network-awareness, efficiency, scalability, robustness, and acquisition delay. S. Chieochan et al [102] conducted survey on channel assignment schemes for infrastructure-based 802.11 WLANs. The authors classified the channel assignment schemes into two categories: a) channel assignment schemes in centrally managed environment and b) channel assignment schemes in uncoordinated environment.…”
Section: Comparison Of Surveys On Channel Assignment Problem In mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since we are interested not only in small value of Ftot but also in even distribution of Fk,n values, it would be beneficial to check how efficiently a given algorithm assigns channels from that point of view. To this end, for each APk, a critical value Fc_k is defined as: where 0.3 is the CRC value for the channel distance equal to 3 (see Table I (2) and then, they are summed up to obtain the Ftot value. The major advantage of such approach is that optimal assignment of channels will always be found.…”
Section: B Algorithm Description 1) Modeling a Set Of Aps As A Graphmentioning
confidence: 99%