2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2014.07.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization and mechanism of MoS2/CdS composite photocatalyst used for hydrogen production from water splitting under visible light

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
79
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 234 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
7
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher binding energy (Fig. 4b) [36]. When photogenerated electron of CdS is easily transferred to MoS 2 , the recombination probability of electron and hole pairs is decreased.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The higher binding energy (Fig. 4b) [36]. When photogenerated electron of CdS is easily transferred to MoS 2 , the recombination probability of electron and hole pairs is decreased.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Data shown in Figure S1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 indicates that the sample is pure MoS2 and no additional peaks were discerned. 46,47,48 Fitting the survey spectrum for Mo 3d and S 2p peaks indicated that the results were nearly stoichiometric with atomic percentages of 37.4% and 62.6%, respectively. The difference from stoichiometry may be due to defects (e.g., point defects, ridges, step edges) on the MoS2 surface and attenuation of sulfur atoms by molybdenum atoms.…”
Section: Mos2 Qualitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Data shown in Figure S1 of Reference 70 indicates that the sample is pure MoS 2 and no additional peaks were discerned. [315][316][317] Fitting the survey spectrum for Mo 3d and S 2p peaks indicated that the results were nearly stoichiometric with atomic percentages of 37.4% and 62.6%, respectively. The difference from stoichiometry may be due to defects (e.g., point defects, ridges, step edges) on the MoS 2 surface and Assuming the same contaminants are adsorbed onto both MoS 2 and HOPG, it can be possible to elucidate qualitative information on the type of contaminants based on their size (~0.50 nm) and affinity for the fresh substrate (adsorption occurs faster on HOPG).…”
Section: Mos 2 Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%