2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2016.06.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of continuous precise workload control and analysis of idleness penalty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, they wait in a pre-shop pool for authorization to be released, according to the workload levels. This authorization is only given whenever jobs follow certain Workload Control rules associated with the work centres of its course [1].…”
Section: Workload Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, they wait in a pre-shop pool for authorization to be released, according to the workload levels. This authorization is only given whenever jobs follow certain Workload Control rules associated with the work centres of its course [1].…”
Section: Workload Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…below 90%, see Bertolini et al 2016a), typical of many Small and Medium sized Enterprises (SMEs). To counteract this drawback, alternative methodologies for workload aggregation and accounting over time have been proposed and tested (Akillioglu et al 2016;Bergamaschi et al 1997), sophisticated dispatching rules have been devised and the standard job-release mechanism has been improved by using, for instance, anti-starvation approaches (Fernandes et al 2017). Although numerical simulations have often proved the quality of these approaches, we note that further complexity is added into a complicated PPC system to achieve an improvement in terms of on time deliveries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%