2003
DOI: 10.1080/15572536.2004.11833047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of diversity inColletotrichum acutatumsensu latoby sequence analysis of two gene introns, mtDNA and intron RFLPs, and mating compatibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 244 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
47
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The translation elongation factor 1-α gene (TEF1) and actin gene (ACT) of P. capitalensis and P. citricarpa were amplified using primers EF1-728F and EF1-986R, and ACT-512F and ACT-783R, respectively (Carbone & Kohn, 1999). The glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GPDH) gene was amplified using primers GDF1 (Guerber et al, 2003) and Gpd2-LM (Myllys et al, 2002) or GDR1 (Guerber et al, 2003) for P. capitalensis isolates, and GDF1 and GPDHR2 (Glienke, et al, 2011) for the P. citricarpa isolates (Table 2).…”
Section: Dna Amplificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The translation elongation factor 1-α gene (TEF1) and actin gene (ACT) of P. capitalensis and P. citricarpa were amplified using primers EF1-728F and EF1-986R, and ACT-512F and ACT-783R, respectively (Carbone & Kohn, 1999). The glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GPDH) gene was amplified using primers GDF1 (Guerber et al, 2003) and Gpd2-LM (Myllys et al, 2002) or GDR1 (Guerber et al, 2003) for P. capitalensis isolates, and GDF1 and GPDHR2 (Glienke, et al, 2011) for the P. citricarpa isolates (Table 2).…”
Section: Dna Amplificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, isolate C. acutatum HB05 from pepper was recently found to be different from strawberry and citrus isolates collected in Florida in Dr. James Correll's laboratory at the University of Arkansas (T. L. Harp & J. C. Correll, unpublished). Furthermore, C. acutatum HB05 was found to be most closely related to isolates recovered from pepper in Taiwan by RFLP analysis (J. C. Correll, personal communication), which were grouped into the mtDNA haplotype D3 (Guerber et al 2003). Our field data demonstrated that pepper was the only crop infected by C. acutatum, and population analysis suggests clonality; one could hypothesize that isolates of C. acutatum recovered from pepper are host-specific.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…More recently, enhanced molecular techniques beyond the traditional use of ITS sequence data have been employed in studies of Colletotrichum and have further delineated species boundaries in this taxonomically complex genus (Correll et al 2007;Crouch et al 2009;Guerber et al 2003;Liu & Correll 2000). Although a great deal of work has been done to identify and distinguish species of Colletotrichum based on the conserved ITS region (Adaskaveg & Hartin 1997;Freeman et al 2000;Sreenivasaprasad et al 1996), additional approaches have been employed more recently to identify and examine sub-species populations within C. acutatum and these subgroups have been shown in some studies to correlate with differences in host range within C. acuatum and other species of Colletotrichum (Du et al 2005;Guerber et al 2003;Liu et al 2012). If these and other genetic differences can be found to correspond directly to differences in host range, then this would support the thought that isolates of C. acutatum recovered from pepper are potentially distinct from isolates recovered from strawberry or citrus, and therefore pose less of a threat for cross-infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Symptoms caused by C. acutatum are often referred to as anthracnose and they include fruit rot, flower blight, foliar blight, stem necrosis, abnormal growth, premature abscission of fruit and root rot (Peres et al, 2005;Sreenivasaprasad & Talhinhas, 2005). Although C. acutatum is generally viewed as a broad host range pathogen, there is considerable strain variation within C. acutatum, and one or a few strains are generally responsible for disease on each susceptible host (Guerber et al, 2003;MacKenzie et al, 2009;Sreenivasaprasad & Talhinhas, 2005). Therefore, strains within C. acutatum have a much more limited host range than would be suggested by the wide range of hosts infected by C. acutatum as a whole.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%