2015
DOI: 10.1109/tevc.2013.2281540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of the Performance of Memetic Algorithms for the Automation of Bone Tracking With Fluoroscopy

Abstract: Reliable knowledge of in vivo joint kinematics is fundamental in clinical medicine. Fluoroscopic motion tracking theoretically permits a millimeter/degree level of accuracy in 3-D joint motion analysis, but the reliability of the local optimization algorithm [Levenberg-Marquardt (LMA)], typically used for the pose estimation, is highly operator dependent. A new memetic algorithm (MA), hybridizing global evolution and a local search metaphor for learning, is proposed to automate the analysis and improve its rel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The selected form of learning in a hybrid genetic algorithm has been shown to affect its performance [37]. Several researchers have compared the performance of pure genetic algorithms with alternative learning strategies in hybrid genetic algorithms [18].…”
Section: Hybrid Lamarckian-baldwinian Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selected form of learning in a hybrid genetic algorithm has been shown to affect its performance [37]. Several researchers have compared the performance of pure genetic algorithms with alternative learning strategies in hybrid genetic algorithms [18].…”
Section: Hybrid Lamarckian-baldwinian Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to incorporate bias in the search for Object 2 , we propose a problem-specific local search operator, and it can be regarded as a kind of memes in the case of MAs (Rubio-Largo et al 2016;Tersi et al 2015;Yuan and Xu 2015). In combinatorial optimization, local search operators generally work in the form of heuristics that are customized to a specific problem.…”
Section: Moma-based Task Hardeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, some of the constraint-handling methods in the literature are: (i) penalties imposed on infeasible solutions to reduce their fitness; (ii) constraint dominance tournaments that, essentially, impede the survival and propagation of infeasible solutions (Deb et al, 2002); (iii) replacement of infeasible solutions with new solutions created randomly (Tersi et al, 2015); (iv) repair of infeasible solutions (Chootinan and Chen, 2006); and (v) stochastic ranking that involves binary tournaments and probabilistic penalty functions (Runarsson and Yao, 2000). While constraint dominance tournaments may have a strong practical appeal based on the ease of implementation, they tend to reduce diversity in the population of candidate solutions too quickly (Liu et al, 2010;Eskandar et al, 2012;Sheikholeslami and Talatahari, 2016), which, in turn, impedes the progress of the optimization through lack of diversity in the gene pool.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%