2006
DOI: 10.5751/es-01781-110212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing Species at Risk II: Using Bayesian Belief Networks as Decision Support Tools to Determine Species Conservation Categories Under the Northwest Forest Plan

Abstract: Characterizing species at risk II: using Bayesian belief networks as decision support tools to determine species conservation categories under the Northwest Forest Plan. Ecology and Society 11(2): 12.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, providing for multiple scoring rounds and guided discussions could result in major changes in some panelists' judgments (e.g., Marcot et al 2006), although it is best to not conduct additional rounds when outcomes seem to have stabilized (Armstrong 2001).…”
Section: Value Of Multiple Scoring Roundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, providing for multiple scoring rounds and guided discussions could result in major changes in some panelists' judgments (e.g., Marcot et al 2006), although it is best to not conduct additional rounds when outcomes seem to have stabilized (Armstrong 2001).…”
Section: Value Of Multiple Scoring Roundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the assessment of rare animals, there is no relevant information, so these three elements are established by means of an expert panel. The expert panel consists of the authors: an ornithologist and several specialists in environmental management or information systems, who formulate the BBN model according to the guidelines proposed by Marcot et al (2006), as shown in Fig. 3.…”
Section: Bayesian Belief Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In natural resource management, BBNs have been used to analyze the effects of land planning on wildlife (Howes et al, 2010;La Morgia et al, 2008;Marcot, 2006), and in conservation planning for potentially rare and endangered wildlife species (Marcot et al, 2006a;Steventon, 2008). BBNs have also been applied to landscape management (Bacon et al, 2002;Ticehurst et al, 2011) and management of ecosystems and biodiversity (McCann et al, 2006;Nyberg et al, 2006;Pollino et al, 2007;Shenton et al, 2011).…”
Section: Bridging Between Systems Thinking and The Bayesian Belief Nementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This helps identify which inputs most affect the output, and is an important process in model testing, providing an understanding of the influential pathways of a single variable (node) or array of nodes on another variable through the Nguyen Huu Hoang-2017 124 developed BBNs (Howes et al, 2010;Marcot et al, 2006a;Marcot et al, 2001). For categorical variables, sensitivity analysis is a calculation of entropy reduction, while for continuous variables, variance reduction is used.…”
Section: Model Validation and Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation