2003
DOI: 10.1002/env.573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining environmental information via hierarchical modeling: an example using mutagenic potencies

Abstract: SUMMARYMutagenesis assays of toxic environmental agents often provide only a single snapshot of the agent's potential risk, leading to inferences on a possibly isolated phenomenon. Hierarchical models can enhance inferences on environmental agents and obtain more global perspectives on the potential risk. We investigate the use of such models to combine information across environmental studies. We emphasize combination of potency estimates from bioassays used for environmental hazard identification and risk as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Piegorsch and Cox (5) reviewed generalized linear models with random effects in the estimation of the effective dose in ordinal and continuous regression. Simmons et al (6) looked at modeling mutagenic potencies from different Salmonella strains, and Coull et al (7) conducted a meta-analysis for methyl-mercury using a Bayesian hierarchical model to combine BMD point estimates from multiple studies. While these studies have focused on risk assessment, most have looked at continuous response regression, with less emphasis on nonnormal data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Piegorsch and Cox (5) reviewed generalized linear models with random effects in the estimation of the effective dose in ordinal and continuous regression. Simmons et al (6) looked at modeling mutagenic potencies from different Salmonella strains, and Coull et al (7) conducted a meta-analysis for methyl-mercury using a Bayesian hierarchical model to combine BMD point estimates from multiple studies. While these studies have focused on risk assessment, most have looked at continuous response regression, with less emphasis on nonnormal data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%