2017
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6579/aa7623
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining sparse coding and time-domain features for heart sound classification

Abstract: Our results show that sparse coding is an effective way to define spectral features of the cardiac cycle and its sub-cycles for the purpose of classification. In addition, we demonstrate that sparse coding can be combined with additional feature extraction methods to improve classification accuracy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notable features reported for this dataset includes, time, frequency and statistical features [8], Mel-frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCC) [9], and Continuous Wavelet Transform (CWT) [10]. Classifiers like SVM [11], k-Nearest Neighbor (k-NN) [9], Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) [10], [12] and Random Forest [8], deep learning approaches with 1D & 2D CNNs [13], [14], and Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) [15] based architectures were employed in the challenge submissions. The winning algorithm, similar to a good number of other submissions, proposed an ensemble; a static filter front-end 1D-CNN model combined with an Adaboost-Abstain classifier using a threshold-based voting algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notable features reported for this dataset includes, time, frequency and statistical features [8], Mel-frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCC) [9], and Continuous Wavelet Transform (CWT) [10]. Classifiers like SVM [11], k-Nearest Neighbor (k-NN) [9], Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) [10], [12] and Random Forest [8], deep learning approaches with 1D & 2D CNNs [13], [14], and Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) [15] based architectures were employed in the challenge submissions. The winning algorithm, similar to a good number of other submissions, proposed an ensemble; a static filter front-end 1D-CNN model combined with an Adaboost-Abstain classifier using a threshold-based voting algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tang et al [19] derived the multimodal features based on the HSMM segmentation method and predicted the abnormality of heart sounds using the SVM classifier. Bradley et al [11] extracted the features using sparse coding and time domain followed by classification based on the SVM classifier. Messner et al [16] segmented heart sounds based on a deep recurrent neural network with an average F 1 score of 96%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plesinger et al [9] proposed a novel segmentation method, a histogram based feature selection method and parameterized sigmoid functions per feature, to discriminate between classes. Various machine learning algorithms including SVM [10], k-Nearest Neighbor (k-NN) [7], Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) [11], [12], Random Forest [6], 1D [13] and 2D CNNs [8], and Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) [14] were employed in the challenge. A good number of submissions used an ensemble of classifiers with a voting algorithm [6], [11], [12], [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%