2012
DOI: 10.3233/wor-2012-0282-1053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Common criteria for usability review

Abstract: The propose of this paper is to present a literature review, in a grouping of common criteria for usability approaches of al (2005) and ISO 9241-110 (2006). After establishment of prerequisites for knowledge of the general characteristics of the users who will use the system, are defined and explained the criteria in common: consistency, user control, ease of learning, flexibility, errors management, reduction of excess and visibility system status. Although there is no determination as to which criteria sho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, tools to assess the individual learning progress can be integrated. Early in the development process, quality criteria will be taken into account for the use of online courses and web applications, such as consistency, user control, ease of learning, flexibility, error management, user help and user guidance responsiveness [ 49 ]. A test module will be developed to assess usability.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, tools to assess the individual learning progress can be integrated. Early in the development process, quality criteria will be taken into account for the use of online courses and web applications, such as consistency, user control, ease of learning, flexibility, error management, user help and user guidance responsiveness [ 49 ]. A test module will be developed to assess usability.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qualitative content analysis according to Mayring will be performed [ 47 ]. Data will be paraphrased and, based on usability criteria [ 49 ], will be categorized and interpreted. Revision and further testing is possible as long as serious usability problems are identified.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the collection of user and expert feedback after ideating and modeling in the idea implementation stage allows converging to a final solution in the finalization stage [33]. The process is highly couplable with user-centric usability design principles such as visibility of system status, match between system and the real world, user control and freedom, flexibility, and efficiency of use [39]. Moreover, the four stages are termed discovery, define, develop, and deliver [37].…”
Section: Design Of Bvi Orientation Guidance Using a Double-diamondmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[43][44][45] Good interface consistency can effectively provoke users' prior knowledge and cognitive schema, which will reduce user's learning cost, 46 improve user's operating performance, 43 and enhance system usability. 47 Interface consistency is composed of three dimensions according to Ozok and Salvendy. 45 Color and layout forms in this study were subordinated to the physical consistency dimension.…”
Section: Guiding Significances Of Research Conclusion To the Interfamentioning
confidence: 99%