Communication in the sciences

Brown, Cecelia

doi:10.1002/aris.2010.1440440114

Cited by 23 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 96 publications

(149 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…We therefore developed and employed a multi‐step process to build a dataset that is close to complete, clean and accurate compared with a dataset directly from existing citation databases. Details of these reasons and the steps and algorithms of this process can be found in Strotmann, Zhao, & Bubela (2010). A summary of the key points is provided here.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Mapping the highly collaborative stem cell research field: Adding last-author-based analysis to the author co-citation analysis family

Zhao¹,

Strotmann²

2010

Proc. Am. Soc. Info. Sci. Tech.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper we compare author cocitation analysis (ACA) results for the highly collaborative stem cell (SC) research field 2004-2009 using three types of ACA: all-author, firstauthor, and last-author. The latter of these, introduced here for the first time, is found to be an excellent compromise between first-and all-author ACAs in that (a) Scopus directly supports it and (b) its results are close to those of an (optimal) all-author ACA in fields where last authors are traditionally those who supervise the research published in a paper. We confirm predictions from previous studies that all-author ACA results have better model fits than singleauthor ACA ones, but cannot confirm the hypothesis that significantly higher levels of collaboration in a field lead to significantly greater differences between first-and allauthor ACA results.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Like chemists, biomedical researchers “work in individual laboratories in close association with their own group of students, postdoctoral fellows, and technicians” (Brown, 2010?, p. 307). The lab's head is often the principal investigator who develops initial ideas for research and procures the funding it requires.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mapping the highly collaborative stem cell research field: Adding last-author-based analysis to the author co-citation analysis family

Zhao¹,

Strotmann²

2010

Proc. Am. Soc. Info. Sci. Tech.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Considering the growing amount of shared data, Brown [24] argues that due to limited page space in an article to present data, it became necessary for scientists to organize, disseminate, and archive their researchrelated data digitally, and then link that data to the article. This practice is reinforced by Tenopir and King [25] who highlight that citation linking within and between articles and links from the article to external datasets represent some of the future trends of journals and article publication.…”

Section: Emerging Approaches Regarding Open Access Journals Publicationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Open scientific journals: Emerging practices and approaches

Appel

Albagli

Maciel

2018

ISU

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. This study aims to show how the concept of openness has been manifested and amplified in the universe of open access scholarly journals, pointing out emerging characteristics and practices linked to processes of submission, evaluation, revision, editing, publishing, editing, distribution, access and use of texts for publication. We proceeded to an overview and discussion of the pertinent literature and the identification and analysis of open access journals which have addressed the issue, and to the identification and analysis of cases of open access journals which have been adopting innovative practices, based on information on editorial policies available on their websites. Among the results, we have pointed out aspects of the publications examined, such as the types of licenses used, policies regarding access to research data, publishing formats, charges and alternative metrics of evaluation.

show abstract

“…exceptions being -Biswas and Haque (2008) (Brophy, 2008;Webb et al, 2008), immediate attention being paid to user expectations and needs (Musoke, 2008;Neal, 2009), embedded librarianship in faculty projects and curricula (Corall, 2010;Schumaker, 2011), enhanced communication within the scholarly community (Brown, 2010), increased sharing and collaboration regarding information resources (Mullins, 2012), improved collection development practices (Ross & Sennyey, 2008), involvement in knowledge creation, increased involvement in preservation and publishing (Case, 2008) as well as in information policies and ethical issues (Neal, 2009). For researchers to benefit from such services they need to be aware of what libraries offer (Neal, 2009).…”

Section: Information Needs and Information Behaviour Of Veterinariansmentioning

confidence: 99%

Information Behavior and Expectations of Veterinary Researchers and Their Requirements for Academic Library Services

Nel

Fourie

2016

The Journal of Academic Librarianship

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Communication in the sciences

Cited by 23 publications

References 96 publications

Mapping the highly collaborative stem cell research field: Adding last-author-based analysis to the author co-citation analysis family

Mapping the highly collaborative stem cell research field: Adding last-author-based analysis to the author co-citation analysis family

Open scientific journals: Emerging practices and approaches

Information Behavior and Expectations of Veterinary Researchers and Their Requirements for Academic Library Services

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About