2009
DOI: 10.1590/s1676-24442009000600004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparação das técnicas de captura de híbridos e PCR para a detecção de HPV em amostras clínicas

Abstract: Introdução e objetivos: São conhecidos mais de 100 tipos de papilomavírus humano (HPV), dos quais 30 têm sido reportados em infecções anogenitais. A infecção tem importância clínica, pois alguns tipos virais estão associados a lesões que podem progredir para o câncer cervical. Sabe-se que os métodos moleculares são muito importantes para o diagnóstico dessa infecção. O objetivo do estudo é comparar a detecção de HPV de alto risco pelo método de captura híbrida 2 (CH2) com a detecção do vírus pela reação em cad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
14

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
7
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the 31 viral types identified in our study, 17 (34,53,54,55,61,candHPV62,66,67,70,71,73,81,83,84,candHPV85,candHPV89,HPV114) representing 19.3% of all samples and 57.0% of the HPV DNA positive samples and which include 7 high-risk types (34,53,66,67,70,73,candHPV85) are not within the detection spectrum of the Hybrid Capture ® test. Furthermore, a recent study comparing PCR and hybrid capture methods demonstrated the higher sensitivity of PCR to detect HPV DNA in clinical samples (Rodrigues et al, 2009). Taken together, these findings justify the use of PCR as a tool for gathering information on HPV infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Of the 31 viral types identified in our study, 17 (34,53,54,55,61,candHPV62,66,67,70,71,73,81,83,84,candHPV85,candHPV89,HPV114) representing 19.3% of all samples and 57.0% of the HPV DNA positive samples and which include 7 high-risk types (34,53,66,67,70,73,candHPV85) are not within the detection spectrum of the Hybrid Capture ® test. Furthermore, a recent study comparing PCR and hybrid capture methods demonstrated the higher sensitivity of PCR to detect HPV DNA in clinical samples (Rodrigues et al, 2009). Taken together, these findings justify the use of PCR as a tool for gathering information on HPV infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Molecular diagnosis of HPV infection is important for virus screening, and is mainly based on methods such as: hybrid capture (CH2) (20,23) , in situ hybridization (2) , and PCR (8,21,24) . These techniques have vary widely in terms of sensitivity and specificity, and PCR is the most used today in various areas of molecular diagnostics due to its great ability to detect small fragments of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) (4,11) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, screening for cervical cancer through molecular biology tests began to be considered a strategy for early screening of the virus in women. Among the methods currently available for HPV detection are hybrid capture (HCII), polymerase chain reaction (PCR), solid-phase hybridization (microrrays), and in situ hybridization (14) . Although all methods can be used for this purpose, only the HCII test, a qualitative test, is approved by the Food and Drug Administration and the Brazilian Health Surveillance Agency for the diagnosis of HPV (15) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These PCR is based on the specific amplification of segments of the HPV genome, and has the potential to detect very low levels of viral load in cells and tissues, even in latent infections (14) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%