Comparative analysis based on new competitiveness index

Savić, Nebojša

doi:10.2298/pan1201105s

Cited by 8 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…como se presenta en la Figura 6. Esto sugiere la necesidad de que el índice de competitividad incorpore factores socioeconómicos que permitan valorar mejor el rol de apoyo gubernamental en la competitividad (Chen et al, 2023), tal y como lo hace el ICCR, para superar la crisis socioeconómica que presenta cada región (Savić, 2012) y ayude a encontrar soluciones ad hoc a la situación específica de la población, desarrollando una colaboración público-privada para mejorar los problemas de naturaleza social de la agenda pública. Nota: Elaborado por los autores, 2022.…”

Section: Relación Con Variables De Bienestarunclassified

Análisis Comparado De Competitividad Regional: En Base a Un Índice Compuesto Respecto Del Ranking Nacional Peruano

Bezada

Dávila

Ambia

et al. 2023

THE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

La ausencia de una metodología comúnmente aceptada para medir la competitividad regional ha originado que múltiples países desarrollen sus propios mecanismos para establecer un ranking dentro de su territorio. En Perú, el Instituto Peruano de Economía (IPE) elabora un índice de competitividad regional, cuya metodología indica que la asignación de puntajes y establecimiento del ranking se realiza sobre la base de un cálculo a través de promedios simples. Esto genera dificultades para establecer el nivel de avance o brecha real por atender; puesto que otros países trabajan de forma más efectiva a través del uso de indicadores compuestos. También, se ha desarrollado una metodología para elaboración de un índice compuesto de competitividad regional con resultados agregados. Para demostrar su validez, la presente investigación se desarrolló con el objetivo de estimar y analizar los resultados obtenidos a partir del procesamiento del Índice Compuesto de Competitividad Regional (ICCR) y su impacto sobre el ranking regional. El estudio es de tipo cuantitativo, de corte analítico y exploratorio. Los resultados muestran que el ICCR calculado es una herramienta que se debe utilizar para realizar recomendaciones de política pública considerando que los resultados tienen mayor robustez en relación con el Índice de Competitividad Regional (INCORE).

show abstract

Section: Relación Con Variables De Bienestarunclassified

Análisis Comparado De Competitividad Regional: En Base a Un Índice Compuesto Respecto Del Ranking Nacional Peruano

Bezada

Dávila

Ambia

et al. 2023

THE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In this paper, we analyzed the competitiveness of the Serbian economy using the Country Competitive Index (CCI) developed by Porter, Delgado, Ketels and Stern [31] and which is methodologically detailed in Delgado, Ketels, Porter and Stern [7]. We presented the first analysis of this type on the example of Serbia in Savić (2012), comparing the competitiveness of Serbia in 2012 with 2008 [34]. In this paper, we will compare the competitiveness of Serbia in 2019 compared to 2013 and define recommendations for improving it.…”

Section: Competitiveness In Serbia Based On Porter's Diamondmentioning

confidence: 99%

Serbian economy recovery in the post COVID-19 era: Cluster approach

Savić¹,

Lazarević²,

Vjetrov³

et al. 2021

Ekonomika preduzeća

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The COVID-19 crisis differs from previous ones. It disrupts global value chains, redirects business toward regional cooperation in a highly globalized world, and forces new business model development toward digitalization. This crisis affected both supplyand demand-side and all countries worldwide, regardless of their economic strength. To support economic recovery, while at the same time fighting for health system endurance through lockdowns and prevention measures, economic decision-makers all around the globe have been using expansive macroeconomic policies. One of the first measures was loosening monetary policy. Such measure was taken in 80% of the countries globally and in all emerging markets. Fiscal policy was significant in supporting demand in the short-term, simultaneously resulting in higher public debt, which is becoming one of the constraints for future development. While economists of today are discussing which letter visualizes the best the character of this crisis - V, U, L, W, we got the letter K, which indicates that recovery among countries will differ in growth rates and duration. Accordingly, we are going to live in a world where change is the only constant. To survive within these conditions, digitalization and key clusters' development are crucial for long-term competitiveness. In this paper, we analyzed the competitiveness of the Serbian economy by using the Country Competitiveness Index, emphasizing the importance of microeconomic indicators that represent a powerful tool in analyzing crucial segments for the economy's recovery. We also focused on three clusters' potential: tech, agribusiness and organic food, and tourism.

show abstract

“…By applying the method for calculating NGCI -New Global Competitiveness Index [1] to the competitiveness rankings achieved by Serbia in 2017 according to the Global Competitiveness Report [27], we analyzed Serbia's competitive position in 2017; its competitive position in the earlier periods was analyzed in N. Savić [14], while the comparative analysis of Serbia's position relative to the countries of Central and Southeast Europe can be found in Nebojša Savić, Goran Pitić and Snežana Konjikušić [15, pp. 36-48] and [16, pp.…”

Section: The Competitiveness Of Serbiamentioning

confidence: 99%

Innovation-driven economy and Serbia

Savić¹,

Pitić²,

Lazarević³

2018

Ekonomika preduzeća

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SažetakEkonomske strategije koje za cilj imaju unapređenje konkurentnosti privrede, u aktuelnom trenutku u svoje programe uključuju i stvaranje sistema podrške razvoju inovacija i inovacionih aktivnosti. Podrška razvoju inovacija podstiče se formiranjem efikasnog inovacionog ekosistema. U ovom radu pokušaćemo da prikažemo stanje inovacionog ekosistema u Srbiji. Analizirajući svaki njegov segment i nadovezujući se na zaključke iz sprovedene ankete, ukazujemo na važnost pojedinih polja i njihovu ulogu u stvaranju konkurentnih inovacionih ekosistema. Predstavljamo glavne rezultate nalaza ankete sprovedene među visokotehnološkim IT kompanijama koji su doprineli oslikavanju trenutnog stanja ekosistema u Srbiji. Imajući u vidu to da najznačajniji elemenat konkurentske prednosti postaje inovativnost, od krucijalne je važnosti unapređenje obrazovnih, istraživačko-razvojnih institucija, infrastrukture i angažovanje države na svim nivoima u cilju podrške ovim procesima. Pored toga, ključnu važnost u postizanju ovog cilja ima i povezivanje kompanija sa eksternim institucijama, dostupnost kvalitetnih kadrova i finansija, unapređenje zaštite prava intelektulane svojine, stvaranje preduzetničke kulture među stručnjacima i istraživačko-razvojnim institucijama, i nivo internacionalizacije i pristup globalnom tržištu. AbstractThe economic strategies aimed at improving the competitiveness of the economy currently also include the creation of systems for supporting the development of innovations and innovation-related activities. Support to the development of innovations is encouraged by the formation of an efficient innovation ecosystem. In this paper, we attempt to present the state of the innovation ecosystem in Serbia. By analyzing each of its segments and building on the conclusions drawn from the survey results, we point to the importance of specified fields and their role in the creation of competitive innovation ecosystems. We present the main results of the survey conducted among high-tech IT companies, which have contributed to the presentation of the current state of Serbia's ecosystem. Bearing in mind that innovativeness is becoming the most significant component of competitive advantage, it is crucial to improve educational and research and development institutions, related infrastructure, as well as the government's involvement at all levels with the aim of supporting the abovementioned issue. In this context, it is also important to ensure the connections of companies with external institutions, accessibility of high-quality personnel, and finance, better protection of intellectual property rights, creation of an entrepreneurial culture among experts and research and development institutions, as well as the level of internationalization and access to the global market.

show abstract

Comparative analysis based on new competitiveness index

Cited by 8 publications

References 7 publications

Análisis Comparado De Competitividad Regional: En Base a Un Índice Compuesto Respecto Del Ranking Nacional Peruano

Análisis Comparado De Competitividad Regional: En Base a Un Índice Compuesto Respecto Del Ranking Nacional Peruano

Serbian economy recovery in the post COVID-19 era: Cluster approach

Innovation-driven economy and Serbia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About