Comparative Analysis of Microorganism Species Succession on Three Implant Surfaces With Different Roughness: An In Vivo Study

Freitas, Marcos Motta de; Silva, Cristiano Henrique Pereira da; Groisman, Mario; Vidigal, Guaracilei Maciel

doi:10.1097/id.0b013e31820fb99e

Cited by 21 publications

(30 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Additionally, two studies did not find significant superiority between titanium and zirconia [42,51]. When compared to a different dental material called hydroxyapatite, only zirconia, not titanium, displayed superiority in lowering bacterial biofilm on the implant surfaces [13,43]. In another study, copper-based surfaces exhibited greatly decreased bacterial biofilm compared to titanium [16].…”

Section: Comparison Of Titanium With Other Implant Surface Materialsmentioning

confidence: 95%

The effect of different surface topographies of titanium implants on bacterial biofilm: a systematic review

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To compare the different surface topographies of titanium implants used in dentistry against the formation of bacterial biofilm. To identify relevant studies, the electronic databases PubMed, Science Direct and Springer Link were searched from inception until January 2019. A total of 38 studies were selected for the systematic review (n = 38). The most commonly used titanium surfaces were machined titanium (16.3%), sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched titanium (10.9%), untreated or pure titanium (10.9%), polished titanium (9.8%), physically textured titanium (9.8%), acid-etched titanium (8.7%) and anodized titanium (5.4%). The majority of the studies (78.9%) found that surface topographies (with varying degrees of roughness) had a beneficial effect on the ability to allow low bacterial biofilm on the surfaces. A low roughness value (R a) of below 1 µm was found in 68% of these surfaces. Overall, no specific surface topography was found to be the ideal surface in allowing the least bacterial biofilm attachment. In this study, meta-analysis was not performed. This narrative systematic review provides a summary of the effects of surface topographies for future research and development of new dental implant surfaces and decontamination techniques.

show abstract

Section: Comparison Of Titanium With Other Implant Surface Materialsmentioning

confidence: 95%

The effect of different surface topographies of titanium implants on bacterial biofilm: a systematic review

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The difference in results from in vivo , in situ , and in vitro experiments is clear and the interfering factors involved are inclusion criterions established to select the patients, in relation to in vivo and in situ studies, and the number and types of bacteria used to biofilm formation, in case of in vitro study. Freitas et al [30] in 2005 showed that a more rough surface causes an exponential increase in the number of bacterial cells, when just one kind of bacterium, Streptococcus sanguis , was utilized. However, when the study was performed upon the same type of surface, titanium, changing only the roughness value, and using a large number of bacteria species, the roughness does not act as an influential factor.…”

Section: Surface Characteristics Of Abutments Implantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Relationship between Biofilm and Physical-Chemical Properties of Implant Abutment Materials for Successful Dental Implants

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this review was to investigate the relationship between biofilm and peri-implant disease, with an emphasis on the types of implant abutment surfaces. Individuals with periodontal disease typically have a large amount of pathogenic microorganisms in the periodontal pocket. If the individuals lose their teeth, these microorganisms remain viable inside the mouth and can directly influence peri-implant microbiota. Metal implants offer a suitable solution, but similarly, these remaining bacteria can adhere on abutment implant surfaces, induce peri-implantitis causing potential destruction of the alveolar bone near to the implant threads and cause the subsequent loss of the implant. Studies have demonstrated differences in biofilm formation on dental materials and these variations can be associated with both physical and chemical characteristics of the surfaces. In the case of partially edentulous patients affected by periodontal disease, the ideal type of implant abutments utilized should be one that adheres the least or negligible amounts of periodontopathogenic bacteria. Therefore, it is of clinically relevance to know how the bacteria behave on different types of surfaces in order to develop new materials and/or new types of treatment surfaces, which will reduce or inhibit adhesion of pathogenic microorganisms, and, thus, restrict the use of the abutments with indication propensity for bacterial adhesion.

show abstract

“…Previous in situ studies conducted for longer periods of time have evaluated only the total microbial counts or a few microbial species and did not considered the biochemical composition of the biofilm . Conversely, a study that conducted a comprehensive microbiologic analysis did not consider the biochemical composition of the biofilm . In addition, none of these studies considered the relevance of dietary carbohydrate in changing the composition of the biofilms formed on titanium surfaces.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…11,17 Conversely, a study that conducted a comprehensive microbiologic analysis did not consider the biochemical composition of the biofilm. 18 In addition, none of these studies considered the relevance of dietary carbohydrate in changing the composition of the biofilms formed on titanium surfaces.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of sucrose on biofilm formed in situ on titanium material

Souza

Cury

Filho

et al. 2018

Journal of Periodontology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Comparative Analysis of Microorganism Species Succession on Three Implant Surfaces With Different Roughness: An In Vivo Study

Abstract: The surface roughness does not affect the bacterial species succession in the biofilm. The succession of species was similar during all periods of the study.

Cited by 21 publications

References 30 publications

The effect of different surface topographies of titanium implants on bacterial biofilm: a systematic review

The effect of different surface topographies of titanium implants on bacterial biofilm: a systematic review

The Relationship between Biofilm and Physical-Chemical Properties of Implant Abutment Materials for Successful Dental Implants

Effect of sucrose on biofilm formed in situ on titanium material

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About