J HEALTH POLICY MANAGE 2016
DOI: 10.26911/thejhpm.2016.01.02.05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison Between Hospital Inpatient Cost and INA-CBGs Tariff of Inpatient Care in the National Health Insurance Scheme in Solo, Boyolali and Karanganyar Districts, Central Java

Abstract: Background: Hospital has an important referral system role in the implementation on the National Health Insurance (NHI) Scheme. BPJS Kesehatan (NHI Implementing Agency) pays hospitals by Indonesian Case Based Groups (INA-CBGs) method. This payment method may potentially cause loss or profit to the hospital, when there is discrepancy between hospital inpatient cost and INA-CBGs tariff of inpatient care. This study aimed at investigating the discrepancy between hospital inpatient cost and INA-CBGs tariff of inpa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the five years of JKN, there have been various opinions which state that medical services with INA CBG rates are judged to have differences with hospital medical service tariffs. Research done by Rahayuningrum et al (2016) said similar things that the average hospital inpatient costs were lower than the average INA CBG rates. Mardhatillah et al (2017) also stated that the mean of INA CBG reimbursement in hospitalization for chronic kidney disease was lower than the mean of hospital medical care costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Within the five years of JKN, there have been various opinions which state that medical services with INA CBG rates are judged to have differences with hospital medical service tariffs. Research done by Rahayuningrum et al (2016) said similar things that the average hospital inpatient costs were lower than the average INA CBG rates. Mardhatillah et al (2017) also stated that the mean of INA CBG reimbursement in hospitalization for chronic kidney disease was lower than the mean of hospital medical care costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…However, the relationship was not significant. Rahayuningrum et al (2016) stated that between the class of care with the difference in INA CBG rates and hospital rates, there was a statistically insignificant relationship. The study showed that the average of patient chose class 3.…”
Section: The Relationship Between Class Of Treatment and The Difference In Costs Between Ina Cbgs And The Cost Of Hospital Medical Servicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Association between ICU utilization with tariff difference The analysis result showed that there was negative association which was insignificant between the use of inpatient care in ICU with tariff difference of INA CBGs' and medical care cost for CRD cases at the hospital. It different from the previous study that showed that there was a significant association between ICU care with hospital's tariff (Rahayuningrum, 2016). Karabatsou et al (2016) explained that the total cost of ICU care is greatly influenced by 3 things namely the length of stay in ICU, disease severity, the need for mechanic ventilator and the use of continous dialysisatau CRRT (Continous Renal Replacement Therapy).…”
Section: Association Between Medical Treatment/ Surgery Tariff Differmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The previous study found that INA CBGs' reimbursement was higher than hospital's tariff regardless the diagnosis/ case of disease (Rahayuningrum, 2016).…”
Section: Advantage and Disadvantage Endured By Hospital Related To CLmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Cases with CRR greater than 100% indicate profit/overfunding, while cases with less than 100% CRR indicate deficit/underfunding. Prior studies have revealed determinants of CRR, for example, patient characteristics, severity and LOS (see for instances Rahayuningrum et al, 2016;Ariwardani et al, 2019).…”
Section: Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%