2020
DOI: 10.1007/s13205-020-2051-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of DNA extraction methods for non-marine molluscs: is modified CTAB DNA extraction method more efficient than DNA extraction kits?

Abstract: Isolation of high molecular weight DNA from gastropod molluscs and its subsequent PCR amplification is considered difficult due to excessive mucopolysaccharides secretion which co-precipitate with DNA and obstruct successful amplification. In an attempt to address this issue, we describe a modified CTAB DNA extraction method that proved to work significantly better with a number of freshwater and terrestrial gastropod taxa. We compared the performance of this method with Qiagen ® DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit. R… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite many DNA extraction methods available, the efficiency of methods depends on specimen and preservation (Abdel-Latif & Osman, 2017;Psifidi et al, 2015). DNA extraction methods in marine organisms have been evaluated for PCR application (Chakraborty, Saha & Ananthram, 2020;Jasrotia & Langer, 2019;Nadia & Sadok, 2017;Pereira et al, 2011) but not for long-read sequencing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite many DNA extraction methods available, the efficiency of methods depends on specimen and preservation (Abdel-Latif & Osman, 2017;Psifidi et al, 2015). DNA extraction methods in marine organisms have been evaluated for PCR application (Chakraborty, Saha & Ananthram, 2020;Jasrotia & Langer, 2019;Nadia & Sadok, 2017;Pereira et al, 2011) but not for long-read sequencing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigating the marine organism's genomes can bring interesting insights into clarifying phylogenetic relationships among and within different genera and species, thus shedding light on some plasticity and adaptability characteristics of the species. However, a lack of genomic data from marine fauna is noted, which may be limited by the fastidious high‐quality DNA extraction in sufficient amounts (Chakraborty et al, 2020 ). Marine organisms naturally retain composites that interfere not only with the extraction of high molecular weight DNA but also with downstream molecular analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These organic compounds represent no environmental or health hazard according to their safety data sheets. Other commonly used components of extraction buffers are β-mercaptoethanol, a reducing agent that irreversibly denatures proteins, including degrading enzymes, by reducing disulphide bonds and destroying the native conformation required for enzyme functionality and Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), a cationic detergent of low cost that is generally the method of choice in DNA extractions without kits for a diverse kind of sample, but especially for plant tissues with high polysaccharides and other inhibitory substances [97][98][99]. Although very useful, these two chemicals have been reported as toxic by ecotoxicity tests [100][101][102] and are established as hazardous chemicals by their safety data sheet.…”
Section: Biologicalmentioning
confidence: 99%