2012
DOI: 10.5589/m12-048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of dust source identification techniques over land in the Middle East region using MODIS data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas TOMS-OMI AI is only capable of retrieving absorbing aerosols, MODIS AOD measurements are sensitive to both absorbing and non-absorbing aerosols. The Deep Blue algorithm employs radiances in the blue spectrum, where the surface reflectance is very low, able to detect the presence of aerosols by an increase of total reflectance and enhanced spectral contrast (Ginoux et al, 2012;Karimi et al, 2012). Deep Blue AOD 550 retrievals have been compared to those obtained from AERONET over arid-desert locations exhibiting a satisfactory agreement for the majority of the sites (Ginoux et al, 2012) …”
Section: Toms/omi Aerosol Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas TOMS-OMI AI is only capable of retrieving absorbing aerosols, MODIS AOD measurements are sensitive to both absorbing and non-absorbing aerosols. The Deep Blue algorithm employs radiances in the blue spectrum, where the surface reflectance is very low, able to detect the presence of aerosols by an increase of total reflectance and enhanced spectral contrast (Ginoux et al, 2012;Karimi et al, 2012). Deep Blue AOD 550 retrievals have been compared to those obtained from AERONET over arid-desert locations exhibiting a satisfactory agreement for the majority of the sites (Ginoux et al, 2012) …”
Section: Toms/omi Aerosol Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3] The combination of two instruments in flight (aboard the Terra satellite from 2000 onward and Aqua from 2002 onward), and a wide swath giving daily near-global observations, make the MODIS sensors an attractive choice for such an aerosol dataset. Deep Blue data have since been wellused for various applications, such as identification of dust sources [Ginoux et al, 2012;Karimi et al, 2012;Schepanski et al, 2012], evaluation/development of chemistry transport models [Draxler et al, 2010;Laurent et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2012], and comparison with other satellite-based dust aerosol datasets [DeSouza-Machado et al, 2010;Carboni et al, 2012]. Although other instruments on polar-orbiting satellites, notably the Multiangle Imaging Spectroradiometer (MISR) [Martonchik et al, 1998] and Along-Track Scanning Radiometer (ATSR) [North, 2002;Sayer et al, 2012a] series, are also able to retrieve AOD over deserts, they suffer from a more limited spatial coverage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this is compensated by the much higher spatial and spectral resolution of MODIS, which has 36 spectral channels and generates imagery at spatial resolutions 250 m, 500 m and 1 km, depending on the channel [23]. Hence, several previous studies have developed and described dust-detection tests based on MODIS data [24][25][26][27][28]. Consequently, the aim of this study is to evaluate which of the existing MODIS dust detection methods are most effective over the Arabian Peninsula.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%