2009
DOI: 10.1109/tsm.2008.2010733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Measurement Techniques for Linewidth Metrology on Advanced Photomasks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…; HAADF-STEM and atom probe tomography 143 ; OCD, X-ray fluorescence (XRF) and electrical characterisation 144 . ; and electrical, AFM, and optical 145 .…”
Section: Hybrid or Combined Metrologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…; HAADF-STEM and atom probe tomography 143 ; OCD, X-ray fluorescence (XRF) and electrical characterisation 144 . ; and electrical, AFM, and optical 145 .…”
Section: Hybrid or Combined Metrologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key issue that will increasingly affect all aspects of IC device measurements is traceability 145, 146 . Given that properties and functionality at the nanoscale are governed by absolute size, traceability of nanoscale dimensional measurements is crucial to the success of nanomanufacturing, and indispensable for valid comparisons of the results of various measurement techniques.…”
Section: Hybrid or Combined Metrologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…by taking the reference points on the opposite edges of any line pair. The linewidth measurand is very sensitive to the sensing mechanism; therefore, a same linewidth standard may result in different calibrated values depending on the sensing technology used [267] (see also Sect. 2 and Figure 5).…”
Section: Linewidth Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The critical importance of GLC resulted in creation of a great variety of conceptually, statistically, and algorithmically different techniques, including: (i) direct measurements methods [11], (ii) field-programmable gate array (FPGA) reconfiguration-based approaches [12][13], (iii) schemes that embed and observe dedicated IC structures and specialized circuity [14], and (iv) non-destructive universal techniques that employ global measurements and calculate scaling factors of each gate by solving a system of equations [15] [16][17] [18].…”
Section: A Gate-level Characterization (Glc)mentioning
confidence: 99%