2020
DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2020.1774667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with radiofrequency ablation or microwave ablation for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a systemic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Background: Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and microwave ablation (MWA) are regarded as effective therapies for treating unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We conducted this study to compare the efficiency and safety of TACE combined with RFA (TR group) or MWA (TM group).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…25 MWA can effectively destroy some hypovascular HCC tumors that do not respond well to TACE treatment alone. [26][27][28][29] Another important finding of the study was that TACE following MWA may improve the downstaging rate significantly more than TACE alone. Liver transplantation is considered the standard therapy for HCC patients within MC, with a low recurrence rate (10%) and high 5-year survival rates (70%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…25 MWA can effectively destroy some hypovascular HCC tumors that do not respond well to TACE treatment alone. [26][27][28][29] Another important finding of the study was that TACE following MWA may improve the downstaging rate significantly more than TACE alone. Liver transplantation is considered the standard therapy for HCC patients within MC, with a low recurrence rate (10%) and high 5-year survival rates (70%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The need of minimal invasion has already become a crucial consideration for therapeutic decision‐making in the SAUCCC 8–14 . Accordingly, HA and HATACE possess unique superiorities among multifarious therapies for appropriate HCC patients in the SAUCCC, 17–20,22–33,85–88 which is fully exhibited in the Data .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[8][9][10][11][12][13][14]26 The need of minimal invasion has already become a crucial consideration for therapeutic decision-making in the SAUCCC. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] Accordingly, HA and HATACE possess unique superiorities among multifarious therapies for appropriate HCC patients in the SAUCCC, [17][18][19][20][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][85][86][87][88] which is fully exhibited in the Data S1. COVID-19 throughout the world has caused unprecedented social turmoil on a global level, triggering F I G U R E 3 Risk of bias summary before correction: each risk of bias item for each RCT of sensitivity analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TACE is an attractive option because it can be administered regardless of the size, location, and the number of tumors [6] . With the recent advances in interventional radiology, TACE is now widely used as a palliative treatment for unresectable HCC [7–11] . TACE has also become one of the most widely used postoperative adjuvant treatments after SR [12–15] .…”
Section: Hcc Combination Therapy With Tace and Srmentioning
confidence: 99%