DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-70538-3_58
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Two Methods to Develop Breast Models for Simulation of Breast Tomosynthesis and CT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…O'Connor et al are creating an ensemble of voxelized breast phantoms that are generated by acquiring CT data of mastectomy specimens placed into holders that shape the excised specimen into an uncompressed or compressed position [82][83][84]. While the simulated images are realistic, the O'Connor's voxelized phantoms have a fixed anatomy and position after they have been generated and lack the flexibility of mathematical phantoms.…”
Section: Voxelized Breast Phantomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…O'Connor et al are creating an ensemble of voxelized breast phantoms that are generated by acquiring CT data of mastectomy specimens placed into holders that shape the excised specimen into an uncompressed or compressed position [82][83][84]. While the simulated images are realistic, the O'Connor's voxelized phantoms have a fixed anatomy and position after they have been generated and lack the flexibility of mathematical phantoms.…”
Section: Voxelized Breast Phantomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These specimens were placed in a special holder and imaged with a prototype bench-top cone beam bCT imaging system [82][83][84]. The group used a commercially available segmentation tool in the Mimics software (Materialise NV, Leuven, Belgium).…”
Section: Dedicated Bct Image Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This presents a potential impediment to the widespread deployment of the VCT paradigm in breast imaging. Previous methods to simulate such breast anatomy have involved using mathematical simulation methods (Bliznakova et al 2003, 2010, Bakic et al 2011, 2014, Graff 2016, Pokrajac et al 2012, patient CT data (Li et al 2009, Kiarashi et al 2016, Ikejimba et al 2016, mastectomy CT data (Hoeschen et al 2005, O'Connor et al 2008 and computer generated noise models (Rolland et al 1997, Bochud et al 1999, Heine et al 1999, Castella et al 2008. However, it is a very challenging task to simulate realistic radiological images calculated using such mathematically derived models, since a proper selection of geometrical parameters of the basic primitives (Bliznakova et al 2003) and reduction of geometric appearance of the border between different tissues (Bakic et al 2011) are required to achieve high levels of clinical realism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These simulation methods can be divided into two major categories: (i) methods based upon rules for generating anatomical structures in the breast [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] and (ii) methods based upon individual clinical 3D breast images. [9][10][11] These two categories of methods are complementary; while the second category offers an increased level of realism due to the use of clinical data, the first category offers more flexibility to cover clinically observed variations in breast anatomy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%