2019
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1908.08881
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complexity and Geometry of Sampling Connected Graph Partitions

Abstract: In this paper, we prove intractability results about sampling from the set of partitions of a planar graph into connected components. Our proofs are motivated by a technique introduced by Jerrum, Valiant, and Vazirani. Moreover, we use gadgets inspired by their technique to provide families of graphs where the "flip walk" Markov chain used in practice for this sampling task exhibits exponentially slow mixing. Supporting our theoretical results we present some empirical evidence demonstrating the slow mixing of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our experiments below support the intuition that the time needed for effective sampling has moderate growth; tens of thousands of recombination steps give stable results on practical-scale problems whether we work with the roughly 9000 precincts of Pennsylvania or the roughly 100,000 census blocks in our Virginia experiments. Note that these observations do not contradict the theoretical obstructions in [NDS19], since ReCom is not designed to target the uniform distribution or any other distribution known to be intractable. While ReCom is decidedly nonuniform, the arguments in §5.1 indicate that this nonuniformity is desirable, as the chain preferentially samples from plans that comport with traditional districting principles.…”
Section: Complexity and Mixingmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our experiments below support the intuition that the time needed for effective sampling has moderate growth; tens of thousands of recombination steps give stable results on practical-scale problems whether we work with the roughly 9000 precincts of Pennsylvania or the roughly 100,000 census blocks in our Virginia experiments. Note that these observations do not contradict the theoretical obstructions in [NDS19], since ReCom is not designed to target the uniform distribution or any other distribution known to be intractable. While ReCom is decidedly nonuniform, the arguments in §5.1 indicate that this nonuniformity is desirable, as the chain preferentially samples from plans that comport with traditional districting principles.…”
Section: Complexity and Mixingmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…As noted above, this is often done with a standard technique in MCMC called the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm: fix a compactness score, such as a notion of boundary length |∂P |, prescribe a distribution proportional to x |∂P | on the state space, and use the Metropolis-Hastings rule to preferentially accept more compact plans. As discussed above in §5.2, there are computational obstructions to sampling proportionally to x |∂P | [NDS19]. Even if we are unable to achieve a perfect sample from this distribution, however, it could be the case that this strategy generates a suitably diverse ensemble in reasonable time for our applications.…”
Section: Weighting Simulated Annealing and Parallel Temperingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Otherwise, the step is rejected and we retry. As shown in [31], this procedure results in partitions with geometrically irregular and highly non-compact components; as an example, the start and end positions of each chain are shown in Figure 8. We let both Markov chains run and compute the distance between them at every 1,000th step, using Hamming and transport distance; Figure 9 shows the result.…”
Section: Boundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The case for ReCom rests on its ability to generate plans consisting of compact districts with regular shapes. A practical and well-studied measure for compactness in the graph partitioning setting is to count the total number of cut edges -the edges whose endpoints lie in different districts; plans with fewer cut edges are more compact [10,22]. Empirically, ReCom does generate compact plans according to this measure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%