1990
DOI: 10.1080/01688639008401025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confirmatory factor analysis of the wechsler memory scale-revised in a sample of head-injured patients

Abstract: As part of a standard evaluation of neuropsychological sequelae, the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised (WMS-R) was administered to 107 patients with a history of traumatic brain injury. Confirmatory factor analyses were conducted on the 12 subtests of the WMS-R to examine the fit of various hypothesized factor patterns, including patterns identified in previous exploratory factor analytic studies. Because part of the correlation between immediate and delayed recall trials of the same material is attributable to a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

6
29
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
6
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Model 3 was a three-factor model hypothesizing the existence of Immediate Recall, Delayed Recall, and Inaccurate Recall. This was in line with previous research with other memory tests that had suggested the presence of separate immediate and delayed recall factors in clinical samples (Roth, Conboy, Reeder, & Boll, 1990;Woodard, 1993). Model 4 tested the hypothesis that repetition of information after only one presentation would be better classified as measuring attention, and could be differentiated from consolidated memory for information, similar to what has been found in the standardization samples of other memory tests (Burton, Mittenberg, & Burton, 1993).…”
supporting
confidence: 68%
“…Model 3 was a three-factor model hypothesizing the existence of Immediate Recall, Delayed Recall, and Inaccurate Recall. This was in line with previous research with other memory tests that had suggested the presence of separate immediate and delayed recall factors in clinical samples (Roth, Conboy, Reeder, & Boll, 1990;Woodard, 1993). Model 4 tested the hypothesis that repetition of information after only one presentation would be better classified as measuring attention, and could be differentiated from consolidated memory for information, similar to what has been found in the standardization samples of other memory tests (Burton, Mittenberg, & Burton, 1993).…”
supporting
confidence: 68%
“…The existence of a delayed memory factor (separate from immediate recall) has also been reported by other investigators using different memory tests (Roth et al, 1990;Wiegner & Donders, 1999;Woodard, 1993). However, one recent study did not find support for a separate delayed recall construct using the Wechsler Memory Scale-Third Edition (Millis et al, 1999).…”
Section: Part I: Confirmatory Factor Analysismentioning
confidence: 77%
“…This construct appears to reflect immediate registration or attentional capacity for information presented only once (Donders, 1999). Previous investigations have also identified constructs of attention and concentration as important components of memory functioning using clinical (Burton et al, 1999;Roth et al, 1990;Woodard, 1993) and standardized samples (Burton et al, 1993;Donders, 1999). Learning Efficiency was the second construct identified in the four-factor model.…”
Section: Part I: Confirmatory Factor Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Speci®cally, we were interested to test the competing models of anterograde memory formation which have distinguished between immediate and delayed memory on one hand, and auditory-verbal and visuo-spatial memory on the other hand. Measurement common- ality in WMS-R subtests was modelled in the error variance-covariance matrix for all models tested and, like others, we found that this partialling of method variance led to signi®cant improvement in model ®t, for all models examined (see Jurden et al, 1996;Psychological Corporation, 1997;Roth, Conboy, Reeder, & Boll, 1990). The alternative ®rst-order models examined are summarised in Table 2 and include a four-factor model which distinguished Verbal Comprehension, Perceptual Organization, and Attention-Concentration, from Memory in general (Model 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%