2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraining water limitation of photosynthesis in a crop growth model with sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ΦF declined under drought stress, and the structural component barely showed a reaction. Their results indicated that ΦF was an indicator for instantaneous stress conditions, and it offered enough information to correct crop growth models under water stress [47]. In addition, the total emitted SIF (SIFtot) was calculated as the result of dividing SIF by fesc, and hence SIFtot contained more physiological information compared with SIF.…”
Section: B Differences In Physiological and Non-physiological Informa...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ΦF declined under drought stress, and the structural component barely showed a reaction. Their results indicated that ΦF was an indicator for instantaneous stress conditions, and it offered enough information to correct crop growth models under water stress [47]. In addition, the total emitted SIF (SIFtot) was calculated as the result of dividing SIF by fesc, and hence SIFtot contained more physiological information compared with SIF.…”
Section: B Differences In Physiological and Non-physiological Informa...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such time scale‐dependent SIF response to stress was also evident in Damm et al (2022), which identified a nonlinear response of far‐red SIF (from the airborne HyPlant measurements) to soil moisture deficit in a controlled water experiment for corn, that is, an initial brief increase followed by a subsequent decrease. Unfortunately, such complex SIF‐NPQ‐GPP dynamics under water/heat stress has not been adequately incorporated by the state‐of‐the‐art mechanistic models, for example, SCOPE (Martini et al, 2022; Wohlfahrt et al, 2018), although De Cannière et al (2021) reported improved water and carbon fluxes simulations during water stress if SIF was utilized to constrain the water stress functions in these models. Resolving these discrepancies requires improved theoretical understandings of underlying mechanisms (e.g., stress‐ avoiding or adaptation strategies, Flexas & Medrano, 2002; Rascher et al, 2004) and modeling of such understanding across stress types, severity, and duration (discussion in Sun et al, 2023; Section 3.1.1 above), as well as improved SIF data quality and consistency (Section 4.2).…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, LAI data assimilation of field observations (Tewes et al 2020a) or remotely sensed canopy state variables (Tewes et al 2020b) into agroecosystem models can help to improve model performance. Remote sensing technologies can also help to further understand and estimate biotic (Dutta et al 2008;Yuan et al 2017) and abiotic stresses (De Canniere et al 2021;Liu et al 2019). The addition of soil property input data (soil texture, hydraulic properties), which can be challenging to physically collect in the field.…”
Section: Agriculture 40mentioning
confidence: 99%