1984
DOI: 10.1016/0149-7189(84)90024-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constructing case vignettes for evaluating clinical judgment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also piloted a range of behavioural scenarios to examine whether behavioural intentions could be assessed and measured. These were created jointly by the research team, health professionals, and CUG and were developed in line with empirical guidance on effective vignette development ([44, 45]; see Appendix 3). They presented a range of situations that young people might find themselves in with regard to their asthma symptoms and physical activity and asked them to express their behavioural intentions in these situations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also piloted a range of behavioural scenarios to examine whether behavioural intentions could be assessed and measured. These were created jointly by the research team, health professionals, and CUG and were developed in line with empirical guidance on effective vignette development ([44, 45]; see Appendix 3). They presented a range of situations that young people might find themselves in with regard to their asthma symptoms and physical activity and asked them to express their behavioural intentions in these situations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, our paper patients' written descriptions were not wordfor-word identical to the spoken words of our standardized patients. However, the core clinical elements were the same for both paper patients and standardized patients, paper patients were developed based on an empirical model [40] and we addressed all four areas of study design considered important when assessing the criterion validity of paper patients [27]. Second, standardized patients brought their own X-rays to each visit, whereas paper patients included a written description of the radiographic evidence of OA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standardized patients' spoken words and the paper patients' written descriptions were identical in pertinent clinical history. An empirical model was used to construct the paper patient scenarios [40]. The primary presenting problem (chronic right knee pain) and symptoms consistent with moderate knee OA were the constant factors across all paper patients.…”
Section: Paper Patient Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, vignettes are useful in desensitising and depersonalising responses to sensitive topics. Asking participants to respond to hypothetical situations encountered by other people is found to be effective in lessening any sensitivity which the participants might feel when responding to delicate topics (Heverly, Fitt, and Newman 1984). Thus, vignettes have been applied in both qualitative and quantitative research, particularly to investigate sensitive issues (Sleed et al 2002;Grønhøj and Bech-Larsen 2010), such as racial integration in neighbourhood areas, and abusive and violent behaviour.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%