1996
DOI: 10.3354/meps138083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consumer mobility and the relative importance of consumption and competition following physical disturbance

Abstract: S~m p l e models and an example from the published literature suggest how consumer mobility can alter the relative importance to producers of consumption (predation and herbivory) and competition follow~ng a disturbance that opens habitat for colonization. Highly mobile consumer species often can colonize disturbed habitat at juvenile and adult life stages with high per capita consumption rates. In contrast, consumers with limited mobility, as well as sessile or sedentary prey, can b e restricted to colonizati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the direct cause of this shift at Williamstown is unclear, such a result can occur if the threshold between grazing activity and algal primary productivity is overcome (Harrold and Reed , Breitberg ). If primary productivity is relatively constant, reducing grazing pressure is one way to do this (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the direct cause of this shift at Williamstown is unclear, such a result can occur if the threshold between grazing activity and algal primary productivity is overcome (Harrold and Reed , Breitberg ). If primary productivity is relatively constant, reducing grazing pressure is one way to do this (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monthly consumption C i , t (in kg) is related to kelp biomass in the cell in which agent i is found j ( i ) at time t , K j ( j ), t using a Holling type II functional response relationship (Holling ; Eq. ) based on the assumption that sea urchins are limited by its capacity to process food (Breitburg ):Ci,t=Wi,t·cnormalmax·Kj(i),tc50+Kjfalse(ifalse),t where W is the wet weight of sea urchins (kg), c max is the maximum monthly consumption rate (kg·kg −1 ·month −1 ), and c 50 is the half‐saturation constant. Although sea urchin consumption was negatively correlated with sea water temperature in experimental conditions (from 10.1 to 16.8°C; McBride et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monthly consumption C i,t (in kg) is related to kelp biomass in the cell in which agent i is found j (i) at time t, K j(j),t using a Holling type II functional response relationship (Holling 1959;Eq. 2) based on the assumption that sea urchins are limited by its capacity to process food (Breitburg 1996):…”
Section: Individual Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that temporal changes in infauna were not necessarily related to the magnitude of the tsunami disturbance. Various factors can simultaneously affect temporal changes in infaunal abundance and community structure, such as physical disturbance caused by monsoon storms, and sedimentation due to river discharge during rainy seasons, and changes in food availability and predation pressures (e.g., Virnstein, 1977;Breitburg, 1996;Frost et al,1999;Nakaoka et al, 2004). These causes have an influence on macrobenthic faunal community composition via modification of both the physical nature of habitats and biological interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%