1994
DOI: 10.1016/0017-9310(94)90018-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convective mass transfer and pressure loss characteristics of staggered short pin-fin arrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They determined that the short pin "ns performed a better overall heat transfer than long pin "ns. There are some studies on heat and mass transfer from the surfaces with cylindrical "ns using naphthalene sublimation technique (Goldstein et al, 1994;Sunk et al, 1996), and with cylindrical ice "ns Intemann and Kazmierczak, 1997). Other experimental, numerical and analytical studies on optimal spacing of "ns were also performed (Bejan and Morega, 1993;Bejan, 1995;Stanescu et al, 1996;Yeh, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…They determined that the short pin "ns performed a better overall heat transfer than long pin "ns. There are some studies on heat and mass transfer from the surfaces with cylindrical "ns using naphthalene sublimation technique (Goldstein et al, 1994;Sunk et al, 1996), and with cylindrical ice "ns Intemann and Kazmierczak, 1997). Other experimental, numerical and analytical studies on optimal spacing of "ns were also performed (Bejan and Morega, 1993;Bejan, 1995;Stanescu et al, 1996;Yeh, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This means that better cooling performance can be obtained by adding to or otherwise modifying the geometry of an internal passage. Certain geometric features, such as ribs [1,2], pin-fins [3][4][5], protrusions and dimples [6,7], have been investigated as heat transfer intensifiers. In particular, various types of rib configurations have been studied, due to their simplicity and usefulness [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chyu et al [21] reported that the pin-fin heat transfer is 10% to 20% higher than the endwall heat transfer. Goldstein et al [22] found that the stepped-diameter circular pin-fin array provides a higher mass transfer coefficient and a smaller pressure loss than a uniform-diameter circular pin-fin array. Recent investigations can be found in [23][24][25][26][27].…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%