2000
DOI: 10.1214/aos/1016218228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convergence rates of posterior distributions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

24
1,064
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 598 publications
(1,089 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
24
1,064
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting priors are recommended as default priors in infinite-dimensional spaces by Ghosal et al (1997). In Ghosal et al (2000), this idea was used with a spline basis for density estimation. They showed that with a suitable choice of k, depending on the sample size and the smoothness level of the target function, optimal convergence rates could be obtained.…”
Section: Some Other Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The resulting priors are recommended as default priors in infinite-dimensional spaces by Ghosal et al (1997). In Ghosal et al (2000), this idea was used with a spline basis for density estimation. They showed that with a suitable choice of k, depending on the sample size and the smoothness level of the target function, optimal convergence rates could be obtained.…”
Section: Some Other Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modifying the model to uniform(θ − 1, θ + 1), we see that the Kullback-Leibler numbers are infinite for every pair. Nevertheless, consistency for a general parametric family including such nonregular cases holds under continuity and positivity of the prior density at θ 0 provided that the general conditions of Ibragimov and Has'minskii (1981) can be verified; see Ghosal et al (1995) for details. For infinite-dimensional models, consistency may hold without Schwartz's condition on Kullback-Leibler support by exploiting special structure of the posterior distribution as in the case of the Dirichlet or a tail-free process.…”
Section: Theorem 1 Let θ = M(z + ) With the Total Variation Distancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations