2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conversation effects on neural mechanisms underlying reaction time to visual events while viewing a driving scene: fMRI analysis and asynchrony model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
53
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
3
53
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The slight increases in foot RT for conversation vs. baseline are consistent with studies previously conducted in lab or on road alone using similar event detection methods (e.g., Schreiner et al, 2004;Bowyer et al, 2007Bowyer et al, , 2008Bowyer et al, , 2009Hsieh et al, 2009). Our similar pattern of RT effects for covert and overt speech is consistent with lab studies during MEG brain imaging (Bowyer et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The slight increases in foot RT for conversation vs. baseline are consistent with studies previously conducted in lab or on road alone using similar event detection methods (e.g., Schreiner et al, 2004;Bowyer et al, 2007Bowyer et al, , 2008Bowyer et al, , 2009Hsieh et al, 2009). Our similar pattern of RT effects for covert and overt speech is consistent with lab studies during MEG brain imaging (Bowyer et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The increase in RT to stimulus after driving task should be associated with driving mental fatigue, which is evident by subjective self-report measures. Some researchers proposed an Asynchrony Model in which the extent of neural asynchrony is proportional to the conditioned foot reaction time to visual events while in a driving-like scenario by MEG and fMRI studies [35][36]. Whether the longer RT to oddball task in our study can be explained by the Asynchrony Model still demands a further verifying study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Some brain regions are of particular importance in maintaining the primary driving performance of event detection during a secondary conversation task. Several researchers have confirmed this conclusion by using both fMRI and MEG methods [35][36]. Maybe it is a good explanation for the EEG rhythm changes on different scalp regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…While many studies focused mainly on the mere identification of neural activity associated with dual-task processing (Dux et al, 2006;Erickson et al, 2005;Herath et al, 2001;Hsieh et al, 2009;Jiang et al, 2004;Schubert and Szameitat, 2003;Szameitat et al, 2002), other research focused more specifically on the identification of cortical areas which are activated exclusively in the dual-task but not in the single-task situation (Adcock et al, 2000;Bunge et al, 2000;D'Esposito et al, 1995;Klingberg, 1998;Smith et al, 2001). In addition, a number of further research questions have been followed, such as testing for functional connectivity in dual-task processing (Dux et al, 2009;Stelzel et al, 2009), the effect of training (Dux et al, 2009;Erickson et al, 2007), or the effect of the amount of cortical overlap of the single tasks on dual-task performance (Just et al, 2001(Just et al, , 2008Klingberg, 1998;Klingberg and Roland, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%