Coordination of Fragmentation within the International Air Law

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to analyze the development and branching of the directions for codification and institutionalization of international air law in the context of discussions involving fragmentation of international law. The main task of the work was to determine, on the example of international air law, the nature of the formation and codification of unified international standards in this area and their subsequent distribution of the areas of regulation and levels of specification by specialized subjects of delegated rule-making. There have been used methods of comparativistics and hermeneutics on which, first of all, the comparison and interpretation of the texts of the Paris and Chicago Conventions and their annexes have been made. It is shown that international public law has a tendency of movement from national acts through the level of bilateral agreements to the formation of agreements and regulations of the regional and global levels. This tendency is also quite clearly expressed in the history of the development of international air law. It is also determined, as a fundamental historical trend, the preservation of the dynamic inverse association between the indicated levels in the complication and branching of the directions of codification and institutionalization of international air law. This indicates the need to take into account a non-linear nature of developmental processes of any legal field, including in its characteristics complications, with the support of constant feedback between different levels of legal personality; connection of the subject area of regulation with the specific volume of competence of institutions responsible for one or another level of delegated rule-making, etc. Considering these and other aspects is important to harmonize the problems of fragmentation and to ensure the effectiveness of international law in general and international air law in particular. The connection of the fragmentation of international law is largely due to the uncertainty of the status of individual levels of delegated legal personality and inconsistency of their correlation at the level of international agreements. The problems of fragmentation, which are certainly inadmissible from the point of view of positivist legal thinking, are a source of uncertainty in many important issues that require clear coherence, regardless of conceptual approaches. From the standpoint of postpositivist concepts, it should be sought not so much in substantive codified rules, but in the effectiveness of procedural norms and the activities of the institutions responsible for reconciling the conflict of interests. However, substantive rules must be also involved in new pluralistic approaches to the law, which is not identified with the will of the state.

Countering the sexual solicitation of children using computer technology

“…At the same time, the influence of certain cases is different, and the authority of the scientists involved in the work is not identical. Therefore, the main task of scientific work in jurisprudence is to analyze the available information and formulate it in such a way as to convince other experts in the field of law (Radzivill et al, 2018).…”

Agent-based models: an effective tool in Ukrainian state formation and legal regulation

“…Therefore, strategic planning is not an end in itself and not a panacea for social unrest. It is a tool of interested leaders who have genuinely set the goal of achieving profound changes in all spheres of public relations and life, which will not give any benefits in the results of such planning (Radzivill et al, 2018). The use of ABM in legal decision-making is possible only if the government has clearly defined the goals of public administration and chosen a suitable vector for the development of society.…”

Visual analytics for enterprise financial project management

“…but it rarely helps with questions like "How is the deal size related to the discount strategy?" Similar to the constraints created by aggregation, sampling can also lead to missed opportunities for identifying patterns and trends (Radzivill et al, 2018). Still, sampling also carries the additional disadvantage of introducing errors or data distrust.…”