2014
DOI: 10.1364/jocn.7.000008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-Effective Topology Design for HSR Resilient Mesh Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Summarizing the benefits of PRP and HSR topologies [5][6][7]:- This paper is divided into 5 sections. Section I is for introduction which provides the background of the digital protection explaining the operation of PRP and HSR topologies, Section II deals with the node structures of PRP and HSR topologies.…”
Section: Software Implementation Of Two Seamless Redundant Topologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Summarizing the benefits of PRP and HSR topologies [5][6][7]:- This paper is divided into 5 sections. Section I is for introduction which provides the background of the digital protection explaining the operation of PRP and HSR topologies, Section II deals with the node structures of PRP and HSR topologies.…”
Section: Software Implementation Of Two Seamless Redundant Topologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Ethernet ring protection (ERP) presented by the ITU-T G.8032 Recommendation espouses greatly reliable protection with a rapid protection switching time of less than 50 ms for Ethernet services [2], but with a restrictive failure per ring protection capability [4]. The basic idea of the ERP switching scheme is to handle loop freeness within interconnected Ethernet ring meshes [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a failure happens at a link, the nodes next to the failure, block the failed link, and the RPL is unblocked [1,5]. In addition, the high-availability seamless redundancy (HSR) presented by IEC 62439-3 is receiving attention due to its capability of providing better availability with a zero failover time [4]. However, this technique increases the number of links/special nodes such as HSR and quadruple boxes in the network, which increases CAPEX and OPEX [4,6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main drawback of the techniques, however, is to generate additional control overhead in the networks because they exchange control messages to discover and establish dual paths. In addition, there are other techniques for reducing redundant traffic in HSR networks, including the HSR SwitchBox technique [18], the integration of HSR and OpenFlow (HSE + OF) [19], the reducing multicast traffic (RMT) [20], the cost-effective topology design for HSR resilient mesh networks [21], and the latency and traffic reduction technique for process-level network [22]. The HSR SwitchBox technique defines a new switching node in HSR networks that forwards HSR frames based on looking up of media access control (MAC) tables instead of flooding the frames.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%